These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24096373)

  • 1. The value of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) modified Gleason grading system as a predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Billis A; Quintal MM; Meirelles L; Freitas LL; Costa LB; Bonfitto JF; Diniz BL; Poletto PH; Magna LA; Ferreira U
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2014 May; 46(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 24096373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Various morphometric measurements of cancer extent on needle prostatic biopsies: which is predictive of pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy?
    Quintal MM; Meirelles LR; Freitas LL; Magna LA; Ferreira U; Billis A
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2011 Sep; 43(3):697-705. PubMed ID: 21340462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
    Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
    J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Controversial predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a study from a Latin American (Brazilian) institution.
    Noronha MR; Quintal MM; Magna LA; Reis LO; Billis A; Meirelles LR
    Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(6):779-92. PubMed ID: 24456770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in Japanese men with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.
    Miyake H; Muramaki M; Furukawa J; Tanaka H; Inoue TA; Fujisawa M
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1511-6. PubMed ID: 22658882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.
    Kır G; Seneldir H; Gumus E
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Feb; 20():48-51. PubMed ID: 26750655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting disease recurrence in intermediate and high-risk patients undergoing radical prostatectomy using percent positive biopsies: results from CaPSURE.
    Grossfeld GD; Latini DM; Lubeck DP; Broering JM; Li YP; Mehta SS; Carroll PR
    Urology; 2002 Apr; 59(4):560-5. PubMed ID: 11927314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biparametric Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.
    Takeuchi N; Sakamoto S; Nishiyama A; Horikoshi T; Yamada Y; Iizuka J; Maimaiti M; Imamura Y; Kawamura K; Imamoto T; Komiya A; Ikehara Y; Akakura K; Ichikawa T
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e817-e829. PubMed ID: 29576444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence.
    Corcoran NM; Hong MK; Casey RG; Hurtado-Coll A; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Hovens CM; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
    BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E202-10. PubMed ID: 21443656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
    Grogan J; Gupta R; Mahon KL; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner J; Horvath LG; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
    Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
    BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extended prostate needle biopsy improves concordance of Gleason grading between prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
    San Francisco IF; DeWolf WC; Rosen S; Upton M; Olumi AF
    J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):136-40. PubMed ID: 12478121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.
    Sauter G; Steurer S; Clauditz TS; Krech T; Wittmer C; Lutz F; Lennartz M; Janssen T; Hakimi N; Simon R; von Petersdorff-Campen M; Jacobsen F; von Loga K; Wilczak W; Minner S; Tsourlakis MC; Chirico V; Haese A; Heinzer H; Beyer B; Graefen M; Michl U; Salomon G; Steuber T; Budäus LH; Hekeler E; Malsy-Mink J; Kutzera S; Fraune C; Göbel C; Huland H; Schlomm T
    Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 26542947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Impact of Downgrading from Biopsy Gleason 7 to Prostatectomy Gleason 6 on Biochemical Recurrence and Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality.
    Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
    J Urol; 2017 Apr; 197(4):1060-1067. PubMed ID: 27847296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
    Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Robinson D; Lissbrant IF; Egevad L; Stattin P
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1135-41. PubMed ID: 26707871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.