These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24096592)

  • 1. Detection of ischaemic myocardial lesions with coronary CT angiography and adenosine-stress dynamic perfusion imaging using a 128-slice dual-source CT: diagnostic performance in comparison with cardiac MRI.
    Kim SM; Choi JH; Chang SA; Choe YH
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 86(1032):20130481. PubMed ID: 24096592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Additional value of adenosine-stress dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging in the reclassification of severity of coronary artery stenosis at coronary CT angiography.
    Kim SM; Choi JH; Chang SA; Choe YH
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Dec; 68(12):e659-68. PubMed ID: 24034545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adenosine-stress low-dose single-scan CT myocardial perfusion imaging using a 128-slice dual-source CT: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Choo KS; Hwangbo L; Kim JH; Park YH; Kim JS; Kim J; Chun KJ; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
    Acta Radiol; 2013 May; 54(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 23550182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comprehensive morphologic and functional imaging of heart transplant patients: first experience with dynamic perfusion CT.
    Oebel S; Hamada S; Higashigaito K; von Spiczak J; Klotz E; Enseleit F; Hinzpeter R; Ruschitzka F; Manka R; Alkadhi H
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Oct; 28(10):4111-4121. PubMed ID: 29713770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-phase coronary artery CT angiography extracted from stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion on third-generation dual-source CT: Validation by coronary angiography.
    Yi Y; Wu W; Lin L; Zhang HZ; Qian H; Shen ZJ; Wang Y; Jin ZY; Litt H; Wang YN
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Oct; 269():343-349. PubMed ID: 30224034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical value of resting cardiac dual-energy CT in patients suspected of coronary artery disease.
    Li W; Yu F; Liu M; Yan C
    BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Feb; 22(1):32. PubMed ID: 35220940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic performance of static single-scan stress perfusion cardiac computed tomography in detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with combined invasive coronary angiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance-myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Song I; Yi JG; Park JH; Kim MY; Shin JK; Ko SM
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Oct; 59(10):1184-1193. PubMed ID: 29320864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Feuchtner G; Goetti R; Plass A; Wieser M; Scheffel H; Wyss C; Stolzmann P; Donati O; Schnabl J; Falk V; Alkadhi H; Leschka S; Cury RC
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep; 4(5):540-9. PubMed ID: 21862731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.
    Budoff MJ; Li D; Kazerooni EA; Thomas GS; Mieres JH; Shaw LJ
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27771227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-energy CT perfusion during pharmacologic stress for the assessment of myocardial perfusion defects using a second-generation dual-source CT: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kim SM; Chang SA; Shin W; Choe YH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 24424556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of diagnostic performance between dynamic versus static adenosine-stress myocardial CT perfusion to detect hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: A prospective multicenter study.
    Lee JW; Choe YH; Kim SM; Choi JH; Pak S; Choo KS; Kim JS; Lee CE; Kim YH
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Sep; 101(36):e30477. PubMed ID: 36086714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion Versus Fractional Flow Reserve CT Derived in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The PERFECTION Study.
    Pontone G; Baggiano A; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Fusini L; Fazzari F; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Calligaris G; De Martini S; Ferrari C; Galli S; Grancini L; Ravagnani P; Teruzzi G; Trabattoni D; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Aug; 12(8 Pt 1):1487-1497. PubMed ID: 30343073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective comparison of integrated on-site CT-fractional flow reserve and static CT perfusion with coronary CT angiography for detection of flow-limiting coronary stenosis.
    Guo W; Lin Y; Taniguchi A; Zhu Y; Tripathi P; Yang S; Liu J; Yun H; Jin H; Zhang J; Yang J; Zeng M
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):5096-5105. PubMed ID: 33409778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic Performance of Coronary CT Angiography, Stress Dual-Energy CT Perfusion, and Stress Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison with Combined Invasive Coronary Angiography and Stress Perfusion Cardiac MRI.
    Chung HW; Ko SM; Hwang HK; So Y; Yi JG; Lee EJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2017; 18(3):476-486. PubMed ID: 28458600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic Performance of First-Pass Myocardial Perfusion Imaging without Stress with Computed Tomography (CT) Compared with Coronary CT Angiography Alone, with Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.
    Osawa K; Miyoshi T; Miki T; Koyama Y; Sato S; Kanazawa S; Ito H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149170. PubMed ID: 26894686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience.
    Bastarrika G; Ramos-Duran L; Rosenblum MA; Kang DK; Rowe GW; Schoepf UJ
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):306-13. PubMed ID: 20421800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Bamberg F; Becker A; Schwarz F; Marcus RP; Greif M; von Ziegler F; Blankstein R; Hoffmann U; Sommer WH; Hoffmann VS; Johnson TR; Becker HC; Wintersperger BJ; Reiser MF; Nikolaou K
    Radiology; 2011 Sep; 260(3):689-98. PubMed ID: 21846761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography.
    Blankstein R; Shturman LD; Rogers IS; Rocha-Filho JA; Okada DR; Sarwar A; Soni AV; Bezerra H; Ghoshhajra BB; Petranovic M; Loureiro R; Feuchtner G; Gewirtz H; Hoffmann U; Mamuya WS; Brady TJ; Cury RC
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Sep; 54(12):1072-84. PubMed ID: 19744616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study.
    Nasis A; Ko BS; Leung MC; Antonis PR; Nandurkar D; Wong DT; Kyi L; Cameron JD; Troupis JM; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1812-21. PubMed ID: 23430194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of dynamic computed tomography adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in estimating myocardial blood flow at various degrees of coronary artery stenosis using a porcine animal model.
    Bamberg F; Hinkel R; Schwarz F; Sandner TA; Baloch E; Marcus R; Becker A; Kupatt C; Wintersperger BJ; Johnson TR; Theisen D; Klotz E; Reiser MF; Nikolaou K
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Jan; 47(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 22178894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.