These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24096758)

  • 1. Comparison of treatment effect estimates from prospective nonrandomized studies with propensity score analysis and randomized controlled trials of surgical procedures.
    Lonjon G; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Ahmad N; Aim F; Nizard R; Ravaud P
    Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 24096758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observational studies using propensity score analysis underestimated the effect sizes in critical care medicine.
    Zhang Z; Ni H; Xu X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):932-9. PubMed ID: 24774469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: comparing results of randomized trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions for low back pain.
    Furlan AD; Tomlinson G; Jadad AA; Bombardier C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Feb; 33(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 18303468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do the observational studies using propensity score analysis agree with randomized controlled trials in the area of sepsis?
    Zhang Z; Ni H; Xu X
    J Crit Care; 2014 Oct; 29(5):886.e9-15. PubMed ID: 24996762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can We Trust Observational Studies Using Propensity Scores in the Critical Care Literature? A Systematic Comparison With Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Kitsios GD; Dahabreh IJ; Callahan S; Paulus JK; Campagna AC; Dargin JM
    Crit Care Med; 2015 Sep; 43(9):1870-9. PubMed ID: 26086943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do observational studies using propensity score methods agree with randomized trials? A systematic comparison of studies on acute coronary syndromes.
    Dahabreh IJ; Sheldrick RC; Paulus JK; Chung M; Varvarigou V; Jafri H; Rassen JA; Trikalinos TA; Kitsios GD
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Aug; 33(15):1893-901. PubMed ID: 22711757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatments effects from randomized trials and propensity score analyses were similar in similar populations in an example from cardiac surgery.
    Kuss O; Legler T; Börgermann J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1076-84. PubMed ID: 21482068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unknown confounders did not bias the treatment effect when improving balance of known confounders in randomized trials.
    Kuss O; Miller M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():9-16. PubMed ID: 32540383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Equivalence Approach Is More Appropriate for Comparison of Treatment Effect Estimates.
    Harrison EM; Bhangu A; Swann O; Wigmore SJ
    Ann Surg; 2015 Aug; 262(2):e67. PubMed ID: 24646547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Twenty-year perspective of randomized controlled trials for surgery of chronic nonspecific low back pain: citation bias and tangential knowledge.
    Andrade NS; Flynn JP; Bartanusz V
    Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1698-704. PubMed ID: 24012430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions.
    Hannink G; Gooszen HG; Rovers MM
    Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 23407296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential Pitfalls of Reporting and Bias in Observational Studies With Propensity Score Analysis Assessing a Surgical Procedure: A Methodological Systematic Review.
    Lonjon G; Porcher R; Ergina P; Fouet M; Boutron I
    Ann Surg; 2017 May; 265(5):901-909. PubMed ID: 27232253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reply to Letter: "Equivalence Approach Is More Appropriate for Comparison of Treatment Effect Estimates".
    Lonjon G; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Ahmad N; Aim F; Nizard R; Ravaud P
    Ann Surg; 2015 Aug; 262(2):e67-9. PubMed ID: 24670852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of intervention effects in split-mouth and parallel-arm randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Smaïl-Faugeron V; Fron-Chabouis H; Courson F; Durieux P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 May; 14():64. PubMed ID: 24886043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
    Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials.
    Abraham NS; Byrne CJ; Young JM; Solomon MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 19716267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical Maze procedure as a treatment for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Kong MH; Lopes RD; Piccini JP; Hasselblad V; Bahnson TD; Al-Khatib SM
    Cardiovasc Ther; 2010 Oct; 28(5):311-26. PubMed ID: 20370795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of prospective randomized clinical trials in pediatric surgery: state of the art?
    Moss RL; Henry MC; Dimmitt RA; Rangel S; Geraghty N; Skarsgard ED
    J Pediatr Surg; 2001 Aug; 36(8):1182-6. PubMed ID: 11479852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis of small randomized controlled trials in surgery may be unreliable.
    Rerkasem K; Rothwell PM
    Br J Surg; 2010 Apr; 97(4):466-9. PubMed ID: 20155790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.