These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24096758)

  • 21. A comparison of the results of prospective and retrospective cohort studies in the field of digestive surgery.
    Ukai T; Shikata S; Nakayama T; Takemura YC
    Surg Today; 2017 Jul; 47(7):789-794. PubMed ID: 28205020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The challenge of evaluating surgical procedures.
    Stirrat GM; Farrow SC; Farndon J; Dwyer N
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1992 Mar; 74(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 1567147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incorporating Baseline Outcome Data in Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Non-randomized Studies.
    Syrogiannouli L; Wildisen L; Meuwese C; Bauer DC; Cappola AR; Gussekloo J; den Elzen WPJ; Trompet S; Westendorp RGJ; Jukema JW; Ferrucci L; Ceresini G; Åsvold BO; Chaker L; Peeters RP; Imaizumi M; Ohishi W; Vaes B; Völzke H; Sgarbi JA; Walsh JP; Dullaart RPF; Bakker SJL; Iacoviello M; Rodondi N; Del Giovane C
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():774251. PubMed ID: 35273528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Agreement of treatment effects for mortality from routinely collected data and subsequent randomized trials: meta-epidemiological survey.
    Hemkens LG; Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Ioannidis JP
    BMJ; 2016 Feb; 352():i493. PubMed ID: 26858277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. No inexplicable disagreements between real-world data-based nonrandomized controlled studies and randomized controlled trials were found.
    Mathes T; Rombey T; Kuss O; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():1-13. PubMed ID: 33359322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Randomized controlled trials for evaluating surgical questions.
    Fung EK; Loré JM
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2002 Jun; 128(6):631-4. PubMed ID: 12049555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nonrandomized studies using causal-modeling may give different answers than RCTs: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Ewald H; Ioannidis JPA; Ladanie A; Mc Cord K; Bucher HC; Hemkens LG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():29-41. PubMed ID: 31704350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Bias in the Evaluation of Bias Comparing Randomized Trials with Nonexperimental Studies.
    Franklin JM; Dejene S; Huybrechts KF; Wang SV; Kulldorff M; Rothman KJ
    Epidemiol Methods; 2017 Apr; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 29204330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The z-difference can be used to measure covariate balance in matched propensity score analyses.
    Kuss O
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1302-7. PubMed ID: 23972521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Systematic differences in effect estimates between observational studies and randomized control trials in meta-analyses in nephrology.
    Kimachi M; Onishi A; Tajika A; Kimachi K; Furukawa TA
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6088. PubMed ID: 33731727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Can Propensity Score Analysis Approximate Randomized Experiments Using Pretest and Demographic Information in Pre-K Intervention Research?
    Dong N; Lipsey MW
    Eval Rev; 2018 Feb; 42(1):34-70. PubMed ID: 29291623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Meta-analyses frequently include old trials that are associated with a larger intervention effect: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Smail-Faugeron V; Tan A; Caille A; Yordanov Y; Hajage D; Tubach F; Martin G; Dechartres A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 May; 145():144-153. PubMed ID: 35131467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Applying propensity score methods in medical research: pitfalls and prospects.
    Luo Z; Gardiner JC; Bradley CJ
    Med Care Res Rev; 2010 Oct; 67(5):528-54. PubMed ID: 20442340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Propensity-score analysis in thoracic surgery: When, why, and an introduction to how.
    Winger DG; Nason KS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Jun; 151(6):1484-7. PubMed ID: 27207121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing treatment effects between propensity scores and randomized controlled trials: improving conduct and reporting.
    Collins GS; Le Manach Y
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Aug; 33(15):1867-9. PubMed ID: 22745354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Propensity scores for comparative effectiveness research: Finding the right match.
    Sheetz KH; Derstine B; Englesbe MJ
    Surgery; 2016 Dec; 160(6):1425-1426. PubMed ID: 27486001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Value of Propensity Score Matching to Study Surgical Outcomes.
    Hwang ES; Wang X
    Ann Surg; 2017 Mar; 265(3):457-458. PubMed ID: 28045717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Incremental Propensity Score Effects for Time-fixed Exposures.
    Naimi AI; Rudolph JE; Kennedy EH; Cartus A; Kirkpatrick SI; Haas DM; Simhan H; Bodnar LM
    Epidemiology; 2021 Mar; 32(2):202-208. PubMed ID: 33470712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Evidence on the Ten Most Common Surgical Interventions in the United States From 1970 to 2018.
    Henry M; Rong LQ; Wingo M; Rahouma M; Girardi LN; Gaudino M
    Ann Surg; 2019 Aug; 270(2):e16-e17. PubMed ID: 31306157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Randomised surgical trials.
    Chang SM
    Lancet; 1993 Oct; 342(8876):929. PubMed ID: 8105189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.