430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24096966)
1. Spoof research paper is accepted by 157 journals.
Hawkes N
BMJ; 2013 Oct; 347():f5975. PubMed ID: 24096966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions].
Maisonneuve H
Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):853-60. PubMed ID: 22836196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and integrity include hearing both sides.
Wylie DT
Optometry; 2010 Sep; 81(9):429. PubMed ID: 20728819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Authorship and co-authorship].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Publication ethics.
Freeman PB
Optometry; 2010 Apr; 81(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 20346886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.
Freedman JE
Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The role and responsibilities of coauthors.
Lancet; 2008 Sep; 372(9641):778. PubMed ID: 18774402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer-Review Fraud--Hacking the Scientific Publication Process.
Haug CJ
N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(25):2393-5. PubMed ID: 26488392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry publication standards of ethical conduct.
Lefebvre CA; Lang BR
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 15798678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of authorship policies at top-ranked peer-reviewed biomedical journals.
Bosch X; Pericas JM; Hernández C; Torrents A
Arch Intern Med; 2012 Jan; 172(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 22232152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific integrity. Responding to possible plagiarism.
Long TC; Errami M; George AC; Sun Z; Garner HR
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1293-4. PubMed ID: 19265004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Policies of dental journals for reporting and monitoring authorship and contributorship.
Faggion CM
Br Dent J; 2011 Sep; 211(5):223-7. PubMed ID: 21904359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cases of fraud in publications: From Darsee to Poldermans].
Bonnet F; Samama CM
Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):816-20. PubMed ID: 22727915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
Werkö L
Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Your paper has been accepted for publication.
Munk-Jørgensen P; Christiansen B; Licht RW
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2010 Jan; 121(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20059451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
