431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24096966)
21. The manuscript review process.
Triadafilopoulos G
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6 Suppl):S23-5. PubMed ID: 17113850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. On peer review.
Schuklenk U
Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):ii-iii. PubMed ID: 25586285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Dealing with editorial misconduct: what about relationship with reviewers and authors?
Laube RE
BMJ; 2005 Feb; 330(7487):364. PubMed ID: 15705711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Science for sale: the rise of predatory journals.
Bartholomew RE
J R Soc Med; 2014 Oct; 107(10):384-5. PubMed ID: 25271271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters.
Wager E
Maturitas; 2009 Feb; 62(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 19147308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A matter of trust: introducing the journal scientific integrity policy.
McDonald JM; Eisemann MG; Cox AE
Am J Pathol; 2007 Jul; 171(1):1. PubMed ID: 17591946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Reflections on a retraction.
Kennedy D
Science; 2000 Aug; 289(5482):1137. PubMed ID: 10970223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Korean scandal will have global fallout.
Check E; Cyranoski D
Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7071):1056-7. PubMed ID: 16371963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Researchers have finally created a tool to spot duplicated images across thousands of papers.
Butler D
Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7694):18. PubMed ID: 29493609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
Adam D; Knight J
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Big and small research fraud].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Aug; 126(16):2089. PubMed ID: 16932774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. How to submit to a scientific journal and get published.
Junaid J
J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 Sep; 62(9):977-8. PubMed ID: 23139992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Research misconduct policies of high impact biomedical journals.
Redman BK; Merz JF
Account Res; 2006; 13(3):247-58. PubMed ID: 17124760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A case of plagiarism: lessons for editors, authors, reviewers, readers, and plagiarists.
Alspach JG
Crit Care Nurse; 2014 Oct; 34(5):12-6. PubMed ID: 25274760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Tattered threads.
Shafer SL
Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1361-3. PubMed ID: 19372305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.
Wager E; Williams P
J Med Ethics; 2011 Sep; 37(9):567-70. PubMed ID: 21486985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. 'Two Minds with but a Single Thought …'.
Heinemann MK; Beyersdorf F
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Jun; 64(4):273-4. PubMed ID: 27183149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
