239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24098005)
1. Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
Neely JG; Sharon JD; Graboyes EM; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Grindler DJ; Dassopoulos T;
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):804-12. PubMed ID: 24098005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right.
Sox HC
Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S7-8. PubMed ID: 20473202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The methods of comparative effectiveness research.
Sox HC; Goodman SN
Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perioperative comparative effectiveness research.
Memtsoudis SG; Besculides MC
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 25(4):535-47. PubMed ID: 22099919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Approaches to comparative effectiveness research in multimorbid populations.
Maciejewski ML; Bayliss EA
Med Care; 2014 Mar; 52 Suppl 3():S23-30. PubMed ID: 24561754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Limitations of evidence-based medicine: the role of experience and expert opinion.
Wenger DR
J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Sep; 32 Suppl 2():S187-92. PubMed ID: 22890460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What do providers, payers and patients need from comparative effectiveness research on diagnostics? The case of HER2/Neu testing in breast cancer.
Trosman JR; Weldon CB; Schink JC; Gradishar WJ; Benson AB
J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Jul; 2(4):461-77. PubMed ID: 24236686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An overview of methods for comparative effectiveness research.
Meyer AM; Wheeler SB; Weinberger M; Chen RC; Carpenter WR
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24314337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An integrated evidence rating to frame comparative effectiveness assessments for decision makers.
Ollendorf DA; Pearson SD
Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S145-52. PubMed ID: 20473206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A framework for assessing the value of diagnostic imaging in the era of comparative effectiveness research.
Gazelle GS; Kessler L; Lee DW; McGinn T; Menzin J; Neumann PJ; van Amerongen D; White LA;
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):692-8. PubMed ID: 22095993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative effectiveness research in the United States: a progress report.
Sullivan SD; Carlson JJ; Hansen RN
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 23227997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology.
Basch E; Abernethy AP; Mullins CD; Reeve BB; Smith ML; Coons SJ; Sloan J; Wenzel K; Chauhan C; Eppard W; Frank ES; Lipscomb J; Raymond SA; Spencer M; Tunis S
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4249-55. PubMed ID: 23071244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A translation table for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research: guidance to improve the value of research for clinical and health policy decision-making.
Tunis SR; Messner DA; Mohr P; Gliklich RE; Dubois RW
J Comp Eff Res; 2012 May; 1(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 24237407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical research on traditional drugs and food items--the potential of comparative effectiveness research for interdisciplinary research.
Witt CM
J Ethnopharmacol; 2013 May; 147(1):254-8. PubMed ID: 23458921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data.
Holve E; Lopez MH; Scott L; Segal C
J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Sep; 1(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 24236421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maximizing the clinical utility of comparative effectiveness research.
Umscheid CA
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Dec; 88(6):876-9. PubMed ID: 20962776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of observational investigations in comparative effectiveness research.
Marko NF; Weil RJ
Value Health; 2010 Dec; 13(8):989-97. PubMed ID: 21138497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Some methodological points to consider when performing systematic reviews in comparative effectiveness research.
Berlin JA; Cepeda MS
Clin Trials; 2012 Feb; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 22049086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
