These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24099137)

  • 1. Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):216-29. PubMed ID: 24099137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The handicap process favors exaggerated, rather than reduced, sexual ornaments.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Sep; 68(9):2534-49. PubMed ID: 24837599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search.
    Waffender A; Henshaw JM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is biased mutation sufficient to save runaway sexual selection?
    Dashtbali M; Henshaw JM
    Evolution; 2024 Jul; 78(8):1478-1485. PubMed ID: 38747625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual selection on multiple female ornaments in dance flies.
    Murray RL; Wheeler J; Gwynne DT; Bussière LF
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Sep; 285(1887):. PubMed ID: 30232158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uninformative exaggeration of male sexual ornaments in barn swallows.
    Bro-Jørgensen J; Johnstone RA; Evans MR
    Curr Biol; 2007 May; 17(10):850-5. PubMed ID: 17412591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. THE EVOLUTION OF MATE PREFERENCES FOR MULTIPLE SEXUAL ORNAMENTS.
    Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 1994 Jun; 48(3):853-867. PubMed ID: 28568273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A; Iwasa Y
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Apr; 95(9):5106-11. PubMed ID: 9560236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The costs of choice in sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A
    J Theor Biol; 1987 Sep; 128(2):195-218. PubMed ID: 3431135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fisher's lost model of runaway sexual selection.
    Henshaw JM; Jones AG
    Evolution; 2020 Feb; 74(2):487-494. PubMed ID: 31886520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual selection and the evolution of costly female preferences: spatial effects.
    Day T
    Evolution; 2000 Jun; 54(3):715-30. PubMed ID: 10937247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How sexual selection can drive the evolution of costly sperm ornamentation.
    Lüpold S; Manier MK; Puniamoorthy N; Schoff C; Starmer WT; Luepold SH; Belote JM; Pitnick S
    Nature; 2016 May; 533(7604):535-8. PubMed ID: 27225128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes.
    Houle D; Kondrashov AS
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jan; 269(1486):97-104. PubMed ID: 11788042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evolution of mating preferences for genetic attractiveness and quality in the presence of sensory bias.
    Henshaw JM; Fromhage L; Jones AG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(33):e2206262119. PubMed ID: 35939704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Handicap principle implies emergence of dimorphic ornaments.
    Clifton SM; Braun RI; Abrams DM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Nov; 283(1843):. PubMed ID: 27903876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting.
    Chaine AS; Lyon BE
    Science; 2008 Jan; 319(5862):459-62. PubMed ID: 18218896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Continual change in mate preferences.
    Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Nature; 1995 Oct; 377(6548):420-2. PubMed ID: 7566117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stabilizing sexual selection for female ornaments in a dance fly.
    Wheeler J; Gwynne DT; Bussière LF
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Jul; 25(7):1233-42. PubMed ID: 22551204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The dilemma of Fisherian sexual selection: mate choice for indirect benefits despite rarity and overall weakness of trait-preference genetic correlation.
    Greenfield MD; Alem S; Limousin D; Bailey NW
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3524-36. PubMed ID: 25308282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.