131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24099175)
1. Preliminary evidence of equivalence of alternate forms of the ImPACT.
Resch JE; Macciocchi S; Ferrara MS
Clin Neuropsychol; 2013; 27(8):1265-80. PubMed ID: 24099175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Examination of the Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test Battery.
Nakayama Y; Covassin T; Schatz P; Nogle S; Kovan J
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 42(8):2000-5. PubMed ID: 24907286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Baseline Neurocognitive Performance and Clearance for Athletes to Return to Contact.
Asken BM; Clugston JR; Snyder AR; Bauer RM
J Athl Train; 2017 Jan; 52(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 27905859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of baseline and post-concussion ImPACT test scores in young athletes with stimulant-treated and untreated ADHD.
Gardner RM; Yengo-Kahn A; Bonfield CM; Solomon GS
Phys Sportsmed; 2017 Feb; 45(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 27736285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized neuropsychological profiles of South African versus US athletes: a basis for commentary on cross-cultural norming issues in the sports concussion arena.
Shuttleworth-Edwards AB; Whitefield-Alexander VJ; Radloff SE; Taylor AM; Lovell MR
Phys Sportsmed; 2009 Dec; 37(4):45-52. PubMed ID: 20048540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Self-reported history of seizure and baseline neurocognitive test performance in student-athletes: an initial investigation.
Zalneraitis BH; Yengo-Kahn AM; Pawlukiewicz AJ; Solomon GS
Phys Sportsmed; 2017 Nov; 45(4):470-474. PubMed ID: 28838286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the test-retest reliability of symptom indices associated with the ImPACT post-concussion symptom scale (PCSS).
Merritt VC; Bradson ML; Meyer JE; Arnett PA
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 May; 40(4):377-388. PubMed ID: 28728465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Valid but Invalid: Suboptimal ImPACT Baseline Performance in University Athletes.
Walton SR; Broshek DK; Freeman JR; Cullum CM; Resch JE
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Jul; 50(7):1377-1384. PubMed ID: 29485429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adolescent Subtest Norms for the ImPACT Neurocognitive Battery.
Henry LC; Sandel N
Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2015; 4(4):266-76. PubMed ID: 25412432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The test-retest reliability of three computerized neurocognitive tests used in the assessment of sport concussion.
Resch JE; Schneider MW; Munro Cullum C
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt A):31-38. PubMed ID: 28935224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Institutionally Based ImPACT Test® Normative Values May Differ from Manufacturer-Provided Normative Values.
Walton SR; Broshek DK; Freeman JR; Hertel J; Meyer JP; Erdman NK; Resch JE
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2020 Apr; 35(3):275-282. PubMed ID: 31711107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Baseline neurocognitive scores in athletes with attention deficit-spectrum disorders and/or learning disability.
Zuckerman SL; Lee YM; Odom MJ; Solomon GS; Sills AK
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2013 Aug; 12(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 23790088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-term test-retest reliability of the ImPACT in healthy young athletes.
O'Brien AM; Casey JE; Salmon RM
Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2018; 7(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 28631965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concussion symptoms and neurocognitive performance of high school and college athletes who incur multiple concussions.
Covassin T; Moran R; Wilhelm K
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Dec; 41(12):2885-9. PubMed ID: 23959963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A two-factor theory for concussion assessment using ImPACT: memory and speed.
Schatz P; Maerlender A
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Dec; 28(8):791-7. PubMed ID: 24123401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One-year test-retest reliability of the online version of ImPACT in high school athletes.
Elbin RJ; Schatz P; Covassin T
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2319-24. PubMed ID: 21841066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Concussion Baseline Testing: Preexisting Factors, Symptoms, and Neurocognitive Performance.
Cottle JE; Hall EE; Patel K; Barnes KP; Ketcham CJ
J Athl Train; 2017 Feb; 52(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 28071936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of ImPACT for measuring processing speed following sports-related concussion.
Iverson GL; Lovell MR; Collins MW
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Aug; 27(6):683-9. PubMed ID: 16019644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT): a systematic review of the prevalence and assessment of invalid performance.
Gaudet CE; Weyandt LL
Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 27687890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immediate Post-concussion and Cognitive Testing: Ceiling Effects, Reliability, and Implications for Interpretation.
Gaudet CE; Konin J; Faust D
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2021 May; 36(4):561-569. PubMed ID: 32978632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
