These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24099370)

  • 1. Accuracy of computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder interpretation by emergency physicians.
    Rafi M; Shetty A; Gunja N
    Emerg Med Australas; 2013 Oct; 25(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 24099370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ray sum image: its efficacy in renal tract calculus detection.
    Deb S; Lu Z; Kuganesan A; Lau KK
    Clin Radiol; 2019 Aug; 74(8):650.e7-650.e12. PubMed ID: 31036313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter-observer Agreement between Urologists and Radiologists in Interpreting the Computed Tomography Images of Emergency Patients with Renal Colic.
    Hong JY; Lee DH; Chang IH; Park SB; Kim CW; Chi BH
    Urol J; 2018 Mar; 15(2):6-9. PubMed ID: 29353466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison.
    Sheafor DH; Hertzberg BS; Freed KS; Carroll BA; Keogan MT; Paulson EK; DeLong DM; Nelson RC
    Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):792-7. PubMed ID: 11110945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study.
    Kim BS; Hwang IK; Choi YW; Namkung S; Kim HC; Hwang WC; Choi KM; Park JK; Han TI; Kang W
    Acta Radiol; 2005 Nov; 46(7):756-63. PubMed ID: 16372698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alternatives to the baseline KUB for CTKUB-detected calculi: evaluation of CT scout and average and maximum intensity projection images.
    Lew HM; Seow JH; Hewavitharana CP; Burrows S
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 May; 42(5):1459-1463. PubMed ID: 27933480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: incidence of associated urinary tract findings.
    Katz DS; Lane MJ; Sommer FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1319-22. PubMed ID: 8633440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A predictive model for stone radiopacity in kidney-ureter-bladder film based on computed tomography parameters.
    Sfoungaristos S; Gofrit ON; Katz R; Yutkin V; Landau EH; Pode D; Duvdevani M
    Urology; 2014 Nov; 84(5):1021-5. PubMed ID: 25174655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size.
    Narepalem N; Sundaram CP; Boridy IC; Yan Y; Heiken JP; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2002 Mar; 167(3):1235-8. PubMed ID: 11832704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How accurate are emergency clinicians at interpreting noncontrast computed tomography for suspected renal colic?
    Holdgate A; Chan T
    Acad Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 10(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 12670843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography.
    Sourtzis S; Thibeau JF; Damry N; Raslan A; Vandendris M; Bellemans M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1491-4. PubMed ID: 10350278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic.
    Poletti PA; Platon A; Rutschmann OT; Schmidlin FR; Iselin CE; Becker CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Apr; 188(4):927-33. PubMed ID: 17377025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can computed tomography scout radiography replace plain film in the evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic?
    Ege G; Akman H; Kuzucu K; Yildiz S
    Acta Radiol; 2004 Jul; 45(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 15323403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MAG3-F0 scintigraphy in decision making for emergency intervention in renal colic after helical CT positive for a urolith.
    Sfakianakis GN; Cohen DJ; Braunstein RH; Leveillee RJ; Lerner I; Bird VG; Sfakianakis E; Georgiou MF; Block NL; Lynne CM
    J Nucl Med; 2000 Nov; 41(11):1813-22. PubMed ID: 11079488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques.
    Heneghan JP; McGuire KA; Leder RA; DeLong DM; Yoshizumi T; Nelson RC
    Radiology; 2003 Nov; 229(2):575-80. PubMed ID: 14526095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical characteristics of ureteral calculi detected by nonenhanced computerized tomography after unclear results of plain radiography and ultrasonography.
    Kobayashi T; Nishizawa K; Watanabe J; Ogura K
    J Urol; 2003 Sep; 170(3):799-802. PubMed ID: 12913701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Management of alternative pathology detected using CT KUB in suspected ureteric colic.
    Sarofim M; Teo A; Wilson R
    Int J Surg; 2016 Aug; 32():179-82. PubMed ID: 27373521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in the use of unenhanced helical CT for acute urinary colic.
    Chen MY; Zagoria RJ; Saunders HS; Dyer RB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1447-50. PubMed ID: 10584780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the KUB radiograph redundant for investigating acute ureteric colic in the non-contrast enhanced computed tomography era?
    Kennish SJ; Bhatnagar P; Wah TM; Bush S; Irving HC
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1131-5. PubMed ID: 18774360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic utility of attenuation measurement (Hounsfield units) in computed tomography stonogram in predicting the radio-opacity of urinary calculi in plain abdominal radiographs.
    Chua ME; Gatchalian GT; Corsino MV; Reyes BB
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2012 Oct; 44(5):1349-55. PubMed ID: 22581423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.