315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24100146)
21. Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of adnexal masses.
Sisodia RM; Del Carmen MG; Boruta DM
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 58(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 25608253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The use of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer.
Humphrey MM; Apte SM
Cancer Control; 2009 Jan; 16(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 19078927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Surgical outcome of robotic surgery in morbidly obese patient with endometrial cancer compared to laparotomy.
Bernardini MQ; Gien LT; Tipping H; Murphy J; Rosen BP
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 22134121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laparoscopic surgical access in morbidly obese women undergoing endometrial cancer surgery: Repurposing the left upper quadrant approach.
Varghese A; Peijnenburg E; Stone RL; Wethington SL; Levinson KL; Beavis A; Yen TT; Tanner EJ; Fader AN
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():56-59. PubMed ID: 31734624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
Conrad LB; Ramirez PT; Burke W; Naumann RW; Ring KL; Munsell MF; Frumovitz M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1121-7. PubMed ID: 25860841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robotics as a new surgical minimally invasive approach to treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review.
Carvalho L; Abrão MS; Deshpande A; Falcone T
Int J Med Robot; 2012 Jun; 8(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 22162096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature.
Cho JE; Nezhat FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(6):669-81. PubMed ID: 19896593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Considerations for minimally invasive gynecologic surgery in obese patients.
Louie M; Toubia T; Schiff LD
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 27273308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impact of Robotic Platforms on Surgical Approach and Costs in the Management of Morbidly Obese Patients with Newly Diagnosed Uterine Cancer.
Leitao MM; Narain WR; Boccamazzo D; Sioulas V; Cassella D; Ducie JA; Eriksson AG; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Brown CL; Levine DA; Jewell EL; Zivanovic O; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 23(7):2192-8. PubMed ID: 26744108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robotic assisted hysterectomy in obese patients: a systematic review.
Iavazzo C; Gkegkes ID
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 293(6):1169-83. PubMed ID: 26861466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer: a comprehensive review.
Rabinovich A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):721-7. PubMed ID: 25344420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Comparison of robotic surgery documentary in gynecological cancer].
Vargas-Hernández VM
Cir Cir; 2012; 80(6):567-72. PubMed ID: 23336154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Current status and future directions of robotic single-site surgery: a systematic review.
Autorino R; Kaouk JH; Stolzenburg JU; Gill IS; Mottrie A; Tewari A; Cadeddu JA
Eur Urol; 2013 Feb; 63(2):266-80. PubMed ID: 22940173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. How to facilitate laparoscopy in obese oncologic patients - 10 steps towards successful surgery.
Kemp MM; Gałczyński K; Botchorishvili R; Bourdel N
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 149(1):223-224. PubMed ID: 29428255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Overcoming extreme obesity with robotic surgery.
Stone P; Burnett A; Burton B; Roman J
Int J Med Robot; 2010 Dec; 6(4):382-5. PubMed ID: 20812220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics.
Mok ZW; Yong EL; Low JJ; Ng JS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jun; 22(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 22561178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The roles and limitations of robotic surgery for obese endometrial cancer patients: a common challenge in gynecologic oncology.
Shemshedini T; Pradhan TS; Pua TL; Tedjarati SS
J Robot Surg; 2015 Jun; 9(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 26531110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Two-port access versus conventional staging laparoscopy for endometrial cancer.
Paek J; Nam EJ; Lee M; Yim GW; Kim S; Kim YT; Kim SW
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Mar; 22(3):515-20. PubMed ID: 22367325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: which should we use?
Fanfani F; Restaino S; Ercoli A; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; Gallotta V; Monterossi G; Cappuccio S; Scambia G
Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Aug; 68(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 26633042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Minimally invasive right colectomy: challenges and clinical practice.
Vinci A; Hanna MH; Pigazzi A
Minerva Chir; 2015 Oct; 70(5):297-309. PubMed ID: 26365367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
