These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24100651)

  • 1. Fractional flow reserve-guided coronary bypass surgery: should surgeons use it?
    Ferguson TB; Chen C; Buch AN
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2013 Nov; 28(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 24100651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fractional flow reserve-guided coronary artery bypass grafting: can intraoperative physiologic imaging guide decision making?
    Ferguson TB; Chen C; Babb JD; Efird JT; Daggubati R; Cahill JM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Oct; 146(4):824-835.e1. PubMed ID: 23915918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve- versus angio-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with intermediate stenosis of coronary artery bypass grafts.
    Di Serafino L; De Bruyne B; Mangiacapra F; Bartunek J; Agostoni P; Vanderheyden M; Scognamiglio G; Heyndrickx GR; Wijns W; Barbato E
    Am Heart J; 2013 Jul; 166(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 23816029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiographically-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
    Thuesen AL; Riber LP; Veien KT; Christiansen EH; Jensen SE; Modrau I; Andreasen JJ; Junker A; Mortensen PE; Jensen LO
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 72(22):2732-2743. PubMed ID: 30497559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fractional flow reserve to guide and to assess coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Pellicano M; De Bruyne B; Toth GG; Casselman F; Wijns W; Barbato E
    Eur Heart J; 2017 Jul; 38(25):1959-1968. PubMed ID: 28025191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of fractional flow reserve in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a meta-analysis.
    Jayakumar S; Bilkhu R; Ayis S; Nowell J; Bogle R; Jahangiri M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2020 May; 30(5):671-678. PubMed ID: 32167555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy.
    Lim HS; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yong AS; Lee BK; Pijls NH; Fearon WF
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Nov; 177(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 25499342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study Design of the Graft Patency After FFR-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided CABG Trial (GRAFFITI).
    Toth GG; De Bruyne B; Kala P; Ribichini FL; Casselman F; Ramos R; Piroth Z; Fournier S; Van Mieghem C; Penicka M; Mates M; Van Praet F; Degriek I; Barbato E
    J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2018 Aug; 11(4):269-273. PubMed ID: 30027499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on fractional flow reserve: Insights from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial.
    Kobayashi Y; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yang HM; Lim HS; Pijls NH; Fearon WF;
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Feb; 204():206-10. PubMed ID: 26670174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in Outcomes of Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Disease or Three-Vessel Disease With the Routine Incorporation of Fractional Flow Reserve in Real Practice.
    Ahn JM; Yoon SH; Roh JH; Lee PH; Chang M; Park HW; Lee JY; Kang SJ; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Han S; Park SW; Park SJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 116(8):1163-71. PubMed ID: 26318500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FFR-guided versus coronary angiogram-guided CABG: A review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.
    Timbadia D; Ler A; Sazzad F; Alexiou C; Kofidis T
    J Card Surg; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2785-2793. PubMed ID: 32697006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study: 5-year follow-up of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease.
    Kapur A; Bartolini D; Finlay MC; Qureshi AC; Flather M; Strange JW; Hall RJ
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2010 Jan; 11(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19797974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fractional flow reserve guided coronary revascularization in drug-eluting era in Thai patients with borderline multi-vessel coronary stenoses.
    Angkananard T; Wongpraparut N; Tresukosol D; Panchavinin P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Feb; 94 Suppl 1():S25-32. PubMed ID: 21721425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
    Pijls NH; Fearon WF; Tonino PA; Siebert U; Ikeno F; Bornschein B; van't Veer M; Klauss V; Manoharan G; Engstrøm T; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; MacCarthy PA; De Bruyne B;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 56(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 20537493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided.
    Nam CW; Yoon HJ; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Hur SH; Kim YN; Chung IS; Koo BK; Tahk SJ; Fearon WF; Kim KB
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 3(8):812-7. PubMed ID: 20723852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease.
    Melikian N; De Bondt P; Tonino P; De Winter O; Wyffels E; Bartunek J; Heyndrickx GR; Fearon WF; Pijls NH; Wijns W; De Bruyne B
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar; 3(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 20298990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of coronary stenoses deferred revascularization for borderline versus nonborderline fractional flow reserve values.
    Depta JP; Patel JS; Novak E; Masrani SK; Raymer D; Facey G; Patel Y; Zajarias A; Lasala JM; Singh J; Bach RG; Kurz HI
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 113(11):1788-93. PubMed ID: 24837255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Toth G; De Bruyne B; Casselman F; De Vroey F; Pyxaras S; Di Serafino L; Van Praet F; Van Mieghem C; Stockman B; Wijns W; Degrieck I; Barbato E
    Circulation; 2013 Sep; 128(13):1405-11. PubMed ID: 23985788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fractional Flow Reserve-Based Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Current Evidence and Future Directions.
    Spadaccio C; Glineur D; Barbato E; Di Franco A; Oldroyd KG; Biondi-Zoccai G; Crea F; Fremes SE; Angiolillo DJ; Gaudino M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(9):1086-1096. PubMed ID: 32222443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis.
    Hamilos M; Muller O; Cuisset T; Ntalianis A; Chlouverakis G; Sarno G; Nelis O; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Wyffels E; Barbato E; Heyndrickx GR; Wijns W; De Bruyne B
    Circulation; 2009 Oct; 120(15):1505-12. PubMed ID: 19786633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.