These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24100930)

  • 1. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement of computer software-assisted optic nerve head photoplanimetry.
    Tanito M; Sagara T; Takamatsu M; Kiuchi Y; Nakagawa T; Fujita Y; Ohira A
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 58(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 24100930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Fundus photoplanimetry of the optic nerve head in the Sakurae Study].
    Tanito M; Sagara T; Takamatsu M; Kiuchi Y; Nakagawa T; Fujita Y; Ohira A
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2012 Aug; 116(8):730-9. PubMed ID: 22973737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Agreement in assessing glaucomatous discs in a clinical teaching setting with stereoscopic disc photographs, planimetry, and laser scanning tomography.
    Hatch WV; Trope GE; Buys YM; Macken P; Etchells EE; Flanagan JG
    J Glaucoma; 1999 Apr; 8(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 10209725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disc characteristics.
    Tielsch JM; Katz J; Quigley HA; Miller NR; Sommer A
    Ophthalmology; 1988 Mar; 95(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 3174002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement in assessing optic discs with a digital stereoscopic optic disc camera (Discam) and Heidelberg retina tomograph.
    Sung VC; Bhan A; Vernon SA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2002 Feb; 86(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 11815347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation of disc morphology quantified on stereophotographs to results by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II, GDx variable corneal compensation, and visual field tests.
    Saito H; Tsutsumi T; Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Feb; 117(2):282-9. PubMed ID: 19969361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Planimetrically determined vertical cup/disc and rim width/disc diameter ratios and related factors.
    Tsutsumi T; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Iwase A; Sakai H; Sawaguchi S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 53(3):1332-40. PubMed ID: 22297486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of the disk damage likelihood scale.
    Henderer JD; Liu C; Kesen M; Altangerel U; Bayer A; Steinmann WC; Spaeth GL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 135(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 12504696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of optic nerve head parameters: comparison of optical coherence tomography with digital planimetry.
    Samarawickrama C; Pai A; Huynh SC; Burlutsky G; Jonas JB; Mitchell P
    J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(8):571-5. PubMed ID: 19826383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optic disc imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: variability and agreement study with Heidelberg retinal tomograph.
    Yang B; Ye C; Yu M; Liu S; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Sep; 119(9):1852-7. PubMed ID: 22572035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated assessment of the optic nerve head on stereo disc photographs.
    Xu J; Ishikawa H; Wollstein G; Bilonick RA; Sung KR; Kagemann L; Townsend KA; Schuman JS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 49(6):2512-7. PubMed ID: 18326698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Study of agreement of optic nerve head topography parameters].
    Liang YB; Liu X; Ling YL; Huang JJ; Zheng XP
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Aug; 39(8):471-5. PubMed ID: 14642167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of optic disc stereometric parameters by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph.
    Miglior S; Albé E; Guareschi M; Rossetti L; Orzalesi N
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1072-7. PubMed ID: 12045046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new digital optic disc stereo camera: intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of optic disc measurements.
    Shuttleworth GN; Khong CH; Diamond JP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2000 Apr; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 10729299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma.
    Varma R; Steinmann WC; Scott IU
    Ophthalmology; 1992 Feb; 99(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 1553210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital stereoscopic analysis of the optic disc: evaluation of a teaching program.
    Sheen NJ; Morgan JE; Poulsen JL; North RV
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Oct; 111(10):1873-9. PubMed ID: 15465549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Observer experience and Cup:Disc ratio assessment.
    Hanson S; Krishnan SK; Phillips J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Oct; 78(10):701-5. PubMed ID: 11700963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter- and intraobserver variation in the analysis of optic disc images: comparison of the Heidelberg retina tomograph and computer assisted planimetry.
    Garway-Heath DF; Poinoosawmy D; Wollstein G; Viswanathan A; Kamal D; Fontana L; Hitchings RA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 83(6):664-9. PubMed ID: 10340972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What optic disc parameters are most accurately assessed using the direct ophthalmoscope?
    Theodossiades J; Murdoch I
    Eye (Lond); 2001 Jun; 15(Pt 3):283-7. PubMed ID: 11450721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma.
    Spaeth GL; Henderer J; Liu C; Kesen M; Altangerel U; Bayer A; Katz LJ; Myers J; Rhee D; Steinmann W
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2002; 100():181-5; discussion 185-6. PubMed ID: 12545692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.