BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24103168)

  • 1. [Application research on RBH perceptual evaluation of voice disorders].
    Li Y; Zheng HL; Wang W; Li M; Chen SC; Chen DH
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 48(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 24103168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation among the dysphonia severity index (DSI), the RBH voice perceptual evaluation, and minimum glottal area in female patients with vocal fold nodules.
    Hussein Gaber AG; Liang FY; Yang JS; Wang YJ; Zheng YQ
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 24275460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How Do Voice Perceptual Changes Predict Acoustic Parameters in Persian Voice Patients?
    Hosseinifar S; Torabinezhad F; Ghelichi L; Roudbari M; Silverman EP; Faham M
    J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):705-709. PubMed ID: 29033255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements.
    Dejonckere PH; Remacle M; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Woisard V; Crevier-Buchman L; Millet B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1996; 117(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 9102729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survey of Voice Acoustic Parameters in Iranian Female Teachers.
    Mohseni R; Sandoughdar N
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):507.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26275636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures.
    Vaz Freitas S; Melo Pestana P; Almeida V; Ferreira A
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25619471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Audio-perceptual evaluation of Portuguese voice disorders-an inter- and intrajudge reliability study.
    Vaz Freitas S; Pestana PM; Almeida V; Ferreira A
    J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 24050822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
    Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of visible speech in the perceptual rating of pathological voices.
    Martens JW; Versnel H; Dejonckere PH
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 17309988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Relationship Between Auditory-Perceptual Rating Scales and Objective Voice Measures in Children With Voice Disorders.
    Fujiki RB; Thibeault SL
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Jan; 30(1):228-238. PubMed ID: 33439742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and Gender in Brazilians With and Without Voice Disorders.
    Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; de Souza GS; Hachiya A; Tsuji DH
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):765.e7-765.e11. PubMed ID: 26627119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Examination of Pre- and Posttreatment Acoustic Versus Auditory Perceptual Analyses of Voice Across Four Common Voice Disorders.
    Gillespie AI; Gartner-Schmidt J; Lewandowski A; Awan SN
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):169-176. PubMed ID: 28688672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences and Reliability of Linear and Nonlinear Acoustic Measures as a Function of Vocal Intensity in Individuals With Voice Disorders.
    de Oliveira Florencio V; Almeida AA; Balata P; Nascimento S; Brockmann-Bauser M; Lopes LW
    J Voice; 2023 Sep; 37(5):663-681. PubMed ID: 34116889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Relationship Between the Aerodynamic Parameters of Voice and Perceptual Evaluation in the Iranian Population With or Without Voice Disorders.
    Aghajanzadeh M; Darouie A; Dabirmoghaddam P; Salehi A; Rahgozar M
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):250.e9-250.e15. PubMed ID: 27542776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation of VHI-30 to Acoustic Measurements Across Three Common Voice Disorders.
    Dehqan A; Yadegari F; Scherer RC; Dabirmoghadam P
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 27085912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Objective multi-parameters analysis of the voice dysphonia].
    Yu P; Wang G; Han B; Yang W; Han D
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Dec; 18(12):751-4. PubMed ID: 15831052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-retest reliability and discriminatory power of multidimensional voice analysis program.
    Afacan NN; Coşkun ZÖ; Çeliker M; Erdivanlı ÖÇ; Terzi S; Dursun E
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2022 Nov; 47(6):628-633. PubMed ID: 35833689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Study on the concordance of objective multi-parameters analysis and perceptual evaluation].
    Yu P; Wang G; Zhang GJ; Tang AR; Wang RG
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 47(10):817-22. PubMed ID: 23302162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
    Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.