These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24103168)

  • 21. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correlation Between Acoustic Measurements and Self-Reported Voice Disorders Among Female Teachers.
    Lin FC; Chen SH; Chen SC; Wang CT; Kuo YC
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 26096986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
    Lu FL; Matteson S
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
    Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceptual structure of adductor spasmodic dysphonia and its acoustic correlates.
    Cannito MP; Doiuchi M; Murry T; Woodson GE
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):818.e5-13. PubMed ID: 23177751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Consistency of voice frequency and perturbation measures in children using cepstral analyses: a movement toward increased recording stability.
    Diercks GR; Ojha S; Infusino S; Maurer R; Hartnick CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Aug; 139(8):811-6. PubMed ID: 23949356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reliability of the perceptual evaluation of adductor spasmodic dysphonia.
    Chhetri DK; Merati AL; Blumin JH; Sulica L; Damrose EJ; Tsai VW
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2008 Mar; 117(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 18444474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Routine acoustic voice analysis: time to think again?
    Brockmann-Bauser M; Drinnan MJ
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Jun; 19(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 21483265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Acoustic voice analysis: reliability of a set of multi-dimensional parameters].
    González J; Cervera T; Miralles JL
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2002 Apr; 53(4):256-68. PubMed ID: 12185903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of the voice in patients with vocal polyps after surgery and voice therapy.
    Petrovic-Lazic M; Jovanovic N; Kulic M; Babac S; Jurisic V
    J Voice; 2015 Mar; 29(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 25301300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: correlation with acoustic parameters and reliability].
    Núñez Batalla F; Corte Santos P; Sequeiros Santiago G; Señaris González B; Suárez Nieto C
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2004; 55(6):282-7. PubMed ID: 15491116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptual and acoustic parameters of vocal nodules in children.
    Gramuglia AC; Tavares EL; Rodrigues SA; Martins RH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Feb; 78(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 24370465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
    Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptual and Acoustic Assessment of Strain Using Synthetically Modified Voice Samples.
    Park Y; Cádiz MD; Nagle KF; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):3897-3908. PubMed ID: 33151770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of consensus training on the reliability of auditory perceptual ratings of voice quality.
    Iwarsson J; Reinholt Petersen N
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 21840170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization.
    Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Uloziene I; Saferis V; Verikas A
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Comparison of cepstral coefficients to other voice evaluation parameters in patients with occupational dysphonia].
    Niebudek-Bogusz E; Strumiłło P; Wiktorowicz J; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Med Pr; 2013; 64(6):805-16. PubMed ID: 24645566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Perceptual and acoustic evaluation of hoarseness].
    Hanschmann H; Berger R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Feb; 90(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 21298598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliability and clinical relevance of perceptual evaluation of pathological voices.
    Dejonckere PH; Remacle M; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Woisard V; Crevier L; Millet B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(4):247-8. PubMed ID: 9865100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Application of dysphonia severity index in laryngeal reflux related voice diseases].
    Zhang F; Yao L; Peng YC; Zheng SX
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 31(22):1745-1748. PubMed ID: 29798189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.