These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Human path navigation in a three-dimensional world. Barnett-Cowan M; Bülthoff HH Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):544-5; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial language as a window on representations of three-dimensional space. Holmes KJ; Wolff P Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):550-1; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Navigation bicoded as functions of x-y and time? Phillips G; Ogeil RP Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):561-2; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Which animal model for understanding human navigation in a three-dimensional world? Orban GA Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):558-9; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The planar mosaic fails to account for spatially directed action. Klatzky RL; Giudice NA Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):554-5; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What counts as the evidence for three-dimensional and four-dimensional spatial representations? Wang RF; Street WN Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):567-8; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Think local, act global: how do fragmented representations of space allow seamless navigation? Dudchenko PA; Wood ER; Grieves RM Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):548-9; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anisotropy and polarization of space: evidence from naïve optics and phenomenological psychophysics. Bianchi I; Bertamini M Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):545-6; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Learning to navigate in a three-dimensional world: from bees to primates. Dyer AG; Rosa MG Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):550; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The study of blindness and technology can reveal the mechanisms of three-dimensional navigation. Pasqualotto A; Proulx MJ Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):559-60; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Has a fully three-dimensional space map never evolved in any species? A comparative imperative for studies of spatial cognition. Moss CF Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):557; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Making a stronger case for comparative research to investigate the behavioral and neurological bases of three-dimensional navigation. Nardi D; Bingman VP Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):557-8; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual experience as a bridge between the retina and a bicoded cognitive map. Durgin FH; Li Z Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):549; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Navigating in a three-dimensional world. Jeffery KJ; Jovalekic A; Verriotis M; Hayman R Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):523-43. PubMed ID: 24103594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The complex interplay between three-dimensional egocentric and allocentric spatial representation. Kaplan DM Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):553-4; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are all types of vertical information created equal? Weisberg SM; Newcombe NS Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):568-9; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]