These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24103626)
1. Does evidence from ethology support bicoded cognitive maps? Zappettini S; Allen C Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):570-1; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptual experience as a bridge between the retina and a bicoded cognitive map. Durgin FH; Li Z Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):549; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Just the tip of the iceberg: the bicoded map is but one instantiation of scalable spatial representation structures. Schultheis H; Barkowsky T Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):565-6; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Navigating in a three-dimensional world. Jeffery KJ; Jovalekic A; Verriotis M; Hayman R Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):523-43. PubMed ID: 24103594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Navigation bicoded as functions of x-y and time? Phillips G; Ogeil RP Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):561-2; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multi-floor buildings and human wayfinding cognition. Hölscher C; Büchner S; Strube G Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):551-2; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Navigating in a volumetric world: metric encoding in the vertical axis of space. Burt de Perera T; Holbrook R; Davis V; Kacelnik A; Guilford T Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):546-7; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The complex interplay between three-dimensional egocentric and allocentric spatial representation. Kaplan DM Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):553-4; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning to navigate in a three-dimensional world: from bees to primates. Dyer AG; Rosa MG Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):550; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The problem of conflicting reference frames when investigating three-dimensional space in surface-dwelling animals. Savelli F; Knierim JJ Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):564-5; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Applying the bicoded spatial model to nonhuman primates in an arboreal multilayer environment. Howard AM; Fragaszy DM Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):552-3; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Think local, act global: how do fragmented representations of space allow seamless navigation? Dudchenko PA; Wood ER; Grieves RM Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):548-9; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Map fragmentation in two- and three-dimensional environments. Yamahachi H; Moser MB; Moser EI Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):569-71; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Has a fully three-dimensional space map never evolved in any species? A comparative imperative for studies of spatial cognition. Moss CF Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):557; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Human path navigation in a three-dimensional world. Barnett-Cowan M; Bülthoff HH Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):544-5; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The planar mosaic fails to account for spatially directed action. Klatzky RL; Giudice NA Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Oct; 36(5):554-5; discussion 571-87. PubMed ID: 24103608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wormholes in virtual space: From cognitive maps to cognitive graphs. Warren WH; Rothman DB; Schnapp BH; Ericson JD Cognition; 2017 Sep; 166():152-163. PubMed ID: 28577445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]