123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24104073)
1. Occlusion culling for computer generated hologram based on ray-wavefront conversion.
Wakunami K; Yamashita H; Yamaguchi M
Opt Express; 2013 Sep; 21(19):21811-22. PubMed ID: 24104073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calculation for computer generated hologram using ray-sampling plane.
Wakunami K; Yamaguchi M
Opt Express; 2011 May; 19(10):9086-101. PubMed ID: 21643163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-generated photorealistic hologram using ray-wavefront conversion based on the additive compressive light field approach.
Wang Z; Zhu LM; Zhang X; Dai P; Lv GQ; Feng QB; Wang AT; Ming H
Opt Lett; 2020 Feb; 45(3):615-618. PubMed ID: 32004265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-generated holograms by multiple wavefront recording plane method with occlusion culling.
Symeonidou A; Blinder D; Munteanu A; Schelkens P
Opt Express; 2015 Aug; 23(17):22149-61. PubMed ID: 26368189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speckle-suppression in hologram calculation using ray-sampling plane.
Utsugi T; Yamaguchi M
Opt Express; 2014 Jul; 22(14):17193-206. PubMed ID: 25090533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From image pair to a computer generated hologram for a real-world scene.
Ding S; Cao S; Zheng YF; Ewing RL
Appl Opt; 2016 Sep; 55(27):7583-92. PubMed ID: 27661586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A framework for holographic scene representation and image synthesis.
Ziegler R; Kaufmann P; Gross M
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2007; 13(2):403-15. PubMed ID: 17218755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acceleration and expansion of a photorealistic computer-generated hologram using backward ray tracing and multiple off-axis wavefront recording plane methods.
Sun M; Yuan Y; Bi Y; Zhang S; Zhu J; Zhang W
Opt Express; 2020 Nov; 28(23):34994-35005. PubMed ID: 33182955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-resolution three-dimensional holographic display using dense ray sampling from integral imaging.
Wakunami K; Yamaguchi M; Javidi B
Opt Lett; 2012 Dec; 37(24):5103-5. PubMed ID: 23258019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fast method of calculating a photorealistic hologram based on orthographic ray-wavefront conversion.
Igarashi S; Nakamura T; Yamaguchi M
Opt Lett; 2016 Apr; 41(7):1396-9. PubMed ID: 27192245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fast and effective occlusion culling for 3D holographic displays by inverse orthographic projection with low angular sampling.
Jia J; Liu J; Jin G; Wang Y
Appl Opt; 2014 Sep; 53(27):6287-93. PubMed ID: 25322109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-generated hologram with occlusion effect using layer-based processing.
Zhang H; Cao L; Jin G
Appl Opt; 2017 May; 56(13):F138-F143. PubMed ID: 28463308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Occlusion handling using angular spectrum convolution in fully analytical mesh based computer generated hologram.
Askari M; Kim SB; Shin KS; Ko SB; Kim SH; Park DY; Ju YG; Park JH
Opt Express; 2017 Oct; 25(21):25867-25878. PubMed ID: 29041249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Realistic expression for full-parallax computer-generated holograms with the ray-tracing method.
Ichikawa T; Yamaguchi K; Sakamoto Y
Appl Opt; 2013 Jan; 52(1):A201-9. PubMed ID: 23292395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficient calculation scheme for high pixel resolution non-hogel-based computer generated hologram from light field.
Park JH
Opt Express; 2020 Mar; 28(5):6663-6683. PubMed ID: 32225909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-hogel-based computer generated hologram with occlusion processing between the foreground light field and background hologram.
Min D; Min K; Choi HJ; Lee H; Park JH
Opt Express; 2022 Oct; 30(21):38339-38356. PubMed ID: 36258402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional computer holography enabled from a single 2D image.
Chang C; Zhu D; Li J; Wang D; Xia J; Zhang X
Opt Lett; 2022 May; 47(9):2202-2205. PubMed ID: 35486760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of wavefront recording plane-based hologram calculations: ray-tracing method versus look-up table method.
Yanagihara H; Shimobaba T; Kakue T; Ito T
Appl Opt; 2020 Mar; 59(8):2400-2408. PubMed ID: 32225774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficient tiled calculation of over-10-gigapixel holograms using ray-wavefront conversion.
Igarashi S; Nakamura T; Matsushima K; Yamaguchi M
Opt Express; 2018 Apr; 26(8):10773-10786. PubMed ID: 29716009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acceleration of computer-generated hologram using wavefront-recording plane and look-up table in three-dimensional holographic display.
Pi D; Liu J; Han Y; Yu S; Xiang N
Opt Express; 2020 Mar; 28(7):9833-9841. PubMed ID: 32225583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
