These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24104775)
61. Comparison of effectiveness of vaginal and abdominal routes in treating severe uterovaginal or vault prolapse. Ng CC; Han WH Singapore Med J; 2004 Oct; 45(10):475-81. PubMed ID: 15455168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. A novel transvaginal approach to correct recurrent apical prolapse after failed sacral colpopexy: case series. Bracken JN; Tran DH; Kuehl TJ; Larsen W; Yandell PM; Shull BL Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1429-33. PubMed ID: 22527557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Uterosacral and sacrospinous ligament suspension for restoration of apical vaginal support. Morgan DM; Larson K Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 53(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 20142645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure. Hanes CR J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Single incision anterior apical mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in pelvic prolapse surgery at 36 months follow-up. Lo TS; Al-Kharabsheh AM; Tan YL; Pue LB; Hsieh WC; Uy-Patrimonio MC Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 56(6):793-800. PubMed ID: 29241922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Combined anterior vaginal wall mesh with sacrospinous ligament fixation or with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse. Heinonen PK; Nieminen K Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 21561703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Long-term follow-up after LeFort colpocleisis: patient satisfaction, regret rate, and pelvic symptoms. Song X; Zhu L; Ding J; Xu T; Lang J Menopause; 2016 Jun; 23(6):621-5. PubMed ID: 26978714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Abdominal and vaginal pelvic support with concomitant hysterectomy for uterovaginal pelvic prolapse: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis. Alfahmy A; Mahran A; Conroy B; Brewka RR; Ibrahim M; Sheyn D; El-Nashar SA; Hijaz A Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2021-2031. PubMed ID: 34050771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. McCall Culdoplasty vs. Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation after vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function in postmenopausal women. Kokanalı MK; Cavkaytar S; Aksakal O; Doğanay M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov; 194():218-22. PubMed ID: 26448134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Single-incision vaginal approach to treat cystocele and vault prolapse with an anterior wall mesh anchored apically to the sacrospinous ligaments. Moore RD; Mitchell GK; Miklos JR Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jan; 23(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 21866442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. Dietz V; de Jong J; Huisman M; Schraffordt Koops S; Heintz P; van der Vaart H Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Nov; 18(11):1271-6. PubMed ID: 17384894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse. Diwan A; Rardin CR; Strohsnitter WC; Weld A; Rosenblatt P; Kohli N Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2006 Jan; 17(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 15997364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension combined with hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. Li C; Dai Z; Shu H J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1918-1924. PubMed ID: 31264339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Perioperative complications in abdominal sacrocolpopexy and vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation procedures. Demirci F; Ozdemir I; Somunkiran A; Topuz S; Iyibozkurt C; Duras Doyran G; Kemik Gul O; Gul B Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Mar; 18(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 16688396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Long-term patient satisfaction with prolapse surgery in general gynecology. Hawkins E; Raajkumar S; Masood M Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1441-8. PubMed ID: 18509585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Comparison of vaginal length after iliococcygeus fixation and sacrospinous ligament fixation. Medina CA; Croce C; Candiotti K; Takacs P Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Mar; 100(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 18022624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review. Maher C; Baessler K; Glazener CM; Adams EJ; Hagen S Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 18092333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Colpocleisis for pelvic organ prolapse: patient goals, quality of life, and satisfaction. Hullfish KL; Bovbjerg VE; Steers WD Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):341-5. PubMed ID: 17666609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Transvaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse using autologous fascia lata graft. Mølsted-Pedersen L; Rudnicki M; Lose G Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(7):874-8. PubMed ID: 16817089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]