These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24104775)

  • 101. Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome.
    Elkadry EA; Kenton KS; FitzGerald MP; Shott S; Brubaker L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Dec; 189(6):1551-7; discussion 1557-8. PubMed ID: 14710061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 102. Bowel preparation before vaginal prolapse surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Ballard AC; Parker-Autry CY; Markland AD; Varner RE; Huisingh C; Richter HE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 123(2 Pt 1):232-238. PubMed ID: 24402594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 103. Vaginal vault prolapse: identification and surgical options.
    Biller DH; Davila GW
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2005 Dec; 72 Suppl 4():S12-9. PubMed ID: 16435732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 104. The Influence of Patients' Goals on Surgical Satisfaction.
    Gillingham A; Collins SA; Kenton K; Bretschneider CE; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Mueller MG; Brown O; Mou T; Geynisman-Tan J
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 27(3):170-174. PubMed ID: 33620900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 105. The Impact of Complications and Pain on Patient Satisfaction.
    Berkowitz R; Vu J; Brummett C; Waljee J; Englesbe M; Howard R
    Ann Surg; 2021 Jun; 273(6):1127-1134. PubMed ID: 31663968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 106. High Patient Satisfaction With Local Anesthesia and Light Sedation in a Novel Fast-Track Setup for Sacrospinous Fixation.
    Husby KR; Klarskov N
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 May; 27(5):335. PubMed ID: 32398407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 107. Activity Restriction Recommendations and Outcomes After Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Mueller MG; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Collins SA; Abernethy MG; Alverdy A; Kenton K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 129(4):608-614. PubMed ID: 28277355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 108. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
    Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 109. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Siddiqui NY; Grimes CL; Casiano ER; Abed HT; Jeppson PC; Olivera CK; Sanses TV; Steinberg AC; South MM; Balk EM; Sung VW;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 125(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 25560102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 110. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
    Barber MD; Brubaker L; Burgio KL; Richter HE; Nygaard I; Weidner AC; Menefee SA; Lukacz ES; Norton P; Schaffer J; Nguyen JN; Borello-France D; Goode PS; Jakus-Waldman S; Spino C; Warren LK; Gantz MG; Meikle SF;
    JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(10):1023-34. PubMed ID: 24618964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 111. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
    JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 112. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Richter HE; Sridhar A; Nager CW; Komesu YM; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Rardin C; Visco A; Mazloomdoost D; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 113. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 114. Surgical Management of Symptomatic Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Larouche M; Belzile E; Geoffrion R
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 137(6):1061-1073. PubMed ID: 33957652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 115. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 116. Immediate Postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Measures and 2-Year Risk of Prolapse Recurrence.
    Siff LN; Barber MD; Zyczynski HM; Rardin CR; Jakus-Waldman S; Rahn DD; Smith AL; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Gantz MG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 136(4):792-801. PubMed ID: 32925609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 117. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
    JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 118. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 119. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 120. Efficacy of Sacrospinous Fixation or Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Stages III and IV: Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Martins SB; Castro RA; Takano CC; Marquini GV; Oliveira LM; Martins Junior PCF; Dias MM; Girão MJBC; Sartori MGF
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2023 Oct; 45(10):e584-e593. PubMed ID: 37944925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.