These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Eye can read your mind: decoding gaze fixations to reveal categorical search targets. Zelinsky GJ; Peng Y; Samaras D J Vis; 2013 Dec; 13(14):. PubMed ID: 24338446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual search is guided to categorically-defined targets. Yang H; Zelinsky GJ Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(16):2095-103. PubMed ID: 19500615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modelling eye movements in a categorical search task. Zelinsky GJ; Adeli H; Peng Y; Samaras D Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2013 Oct; 368(1628):20130058. PubMed ID: 24018720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Disentangling Representations of Object Shape and Object Category in Human Visual Cortex: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction. Proklova D; Kaiser D; Peelen MV J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 May; 28(5):680-92. PubMed ID: 26765944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Guidance toward and away from distractors in repeated visual search. Höfler M; Gilchrist ID; Körner C J Vis; 2015; 15(5):12. PubMed ID: 26067530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search. Painter DR; Dux PE; Travis SL; Mattingley JB J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 34(9):3390-401. PubMed ID: 24573295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search. Hout MC; Walenchok SC; Goldinger SD; Wolfe JM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):977-94. PubMed ID: 25915073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal and peripheral extraction of contextual cues from scenes during visual search. Koehler K; Eckstein MP J Vis; 2017 Feb; 17(2):16. PubMed ID: 28245502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: evidence from contralateral delay activity. Schmidt J; MacNamara A; Proudfit GH; Zelinsky GJ J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):8. PubMed ID: 24599946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does conspicuity enhance distraction? Saliency and eye landing position when searching for objects. Foulsham T; Underwood G Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1088-98. PubMed ID: 19142829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disentangling the effects of spatial inconsistency of targets and distractors when searching in realistic scenes. Spotorno S; Malcolm GL; Tatler BW J Vis; 2015 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 25761330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Categorical templates are more useful when features are consistent: Evidence from eye movements during search for societally important vehicles. Hout MC; Robbins A; Godwin HJ; Fitzsimmons G; Scarince C Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1578-1592. PubMed ID: 28638974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Object detection through search with a foveated visual system. Akbas E; Eckstein MP PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Oct; 13(10):e1005743. PubMed ID: 28991906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Search for two categories of target produces fewer fixations to target-color items. Menneer T; Stroud MJ; Cave KR; Li X; Godwin HJ; Liversedge SP; Donnelly N J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):404-18. PubMed ID: 23294283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual features as stepping stones toward semantics: Explaining object similarity in IT and perception with non-negative least squares. Jozwik KM; Kriegeskorte N; Mur M Neuropsychologia; 2016 Mar; 83():201-226. PubMed ID: 26493748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]