182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24105473)
1. Methods to elicit probability distributions from experts: a systematic review of reported practice in health technology assessment.
Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Nov; 31(11):991-1003. PubMed ID: 24105473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of two methods for expert elicitation in health technology assessments.
Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():85. PubMed ID: 27456844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EXPLICIT: a feasibility study of remote expert elicitation in health technology assessment.
Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Sep; 17(1):131. PubMed ID: 28870196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Use of Expert Elicitation among Computational Modeling Studies in Health Research: A Systematic Review.
Cadham CJ; Knoll M; Sánchez-Romero LM; Cummings KM; Douglas CE; Liber A; Mendez D; Meza R; Mistry R; Sertkaya A; Travis N; Levy DT
Med Decis Making; 2022 Jul; 42(5):684-703. PubMed ID: 34694168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reference Case Methods for Expert Elicitation in Health Care Decision Making.
Bojke L; Soares MO; Claxton K; Colson A; Fox A; Jackson C; Jankovic D; Morton A; Sharples LD; Taylor A
Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):182-193. PubMed ID: 34271832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods to elicit beliefs for Bayesian priors: a systematic review.
Johnson SR; Tomlinson GA; Hawker GA; Granton JT; Feldman BM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 63(4):355-69. PubMed ID: 19716263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eliciting judgements about dependent quantities of interest: The SHeffield ELicitation Framework extension and copula methods illustrated using an asthma case study.
Holzhauer B; Hampson LV; Gosling JP; Bornkamp B; Kahn J; Lange MR; Luo WL; Brindicci C; Lawrence D; Ballerstedt S; O'Hagan A
Pharm Stat; 2022 Sep; 21(5):1005-1021. PubMed ID: 35373454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application and Evaluation of an Expert Judgment Elicitation Procedure for Correlations.
Zondervan-Zwijnenburg M; van de Schoot-Hubeek W; Lek K; Hoijtink H; van de Schoot R
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():90. PubMed ID: 28197115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure.
Knol AB; Slottje P; van der Sluijs JP; Lebret E
Environ Health; 2010 Apr; 9():19. PubMed ID: 20420657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Informing Reimbursement Decisions Using Cost-Effectiveness Modelling: A Guide to the Process of Generating Elicited Priors to Capture Model Uncertainties.
Bojke L; Grigore B; Jankovic D; Peters J; Soares M; Stein K
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Sep; 35(9):867-877. PubMed ID: 28616775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health technology assessment.
Hailey D
Singapore Med J; 2006 Mar; 47(3):187-92; quiz 193. PubMed ID: 16518551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An internet-based method to elicit experts' beliefs for Bayesian priors: a case study in intracranial stent evaluation.
Pibouleau L; Chevret S
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Oct; 30(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 25401304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. USING EXPERT OPINION IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A GUIDELINE REVIEW.
Hunger T; Schnell-Inderst P; Sahakyan N; Siebert U
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(3):131-9. PubMed ID: 27502308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expert Elicitation to Inform a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Screening for Renal Cancer.
Rossi SH; Blick C; Nathan P; Nicol D; Stewart GD; Wilson ECF
Value Health; 2019 Sep; 22(9):981-987. PubMed ID: 31511187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using expert elicitation to prioritize resource allocation for risk identification for nanosilver.
Fauss E; Gorman ME; Swami N
J Law Med Ethics; 2009; 37(4):770-80. PubMed ID: 20122116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Proposal for a Five-Step Method to Elicit Expert Judgment.
Veen D; Stoel D; Zondervan-Zwijnenburg M; van de Schoot R
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2110. PubMed ID: 29259569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of Expert Judgement Across NICE Guidance-Making Programmes: A Review of Current Processes and Suitability of Existing Tools to Support the Use of Expert Elicitation.
Peel A; Jenks M; Choudhury M; Lovett R; Rejon-Parrilla JC; Sims A; Craig J
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2018 Dec; 16(6):819-836. PubMed ID: 30073485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interventions to reduce the risk of surgically transmitted Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a cost-effective modelling review.
Stevenson M; Uttley L; Oakley JE; Carroll C; Chick SE; Wong R
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Feb; 24(11):1-150. PubMed ID: 32122460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A valid and reliable belief elicitation method for Bayesian priors.
Johnson SR; Tomlinson GA; Hawker GA; Granton JT; Grosbein HA; Feldman BM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 63(4):370-83. PubMed ID: 19926253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
