These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24105473)

  • 1. Methods to elicit probability distributions from experts: a systematic review of reported practice in health technology assessment.
    Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Nov; 31(11):991-1003. PubMed ID: 24105473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of two methods for expert elicitation in health technology assessments.
    Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():85. PubMed ID: 27456844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EXPLICIT: a feasibility study of remote expert elicitation in health technology assessment.
    Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Sep; 17(1):131. PubMed ID: 28870196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Use of Expert Elicitation among Computational Modeling Studies in Health Research: A Systematic Review.
    Cadham CJ; Knoll M; Sánchez-Romero LM; Cummings KM; Douglas CE; Liber A; Mendez D; Meza R; Mistry R; Sertkaya A; Travis N; Levy DT
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Jul; 42(5):684-703. PubMed ID: 34694168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reference Case Methods for Expert Elicitation in Health Care Decision Making.
    Bojke L; Soares MO; Claxton K; Colson A; Fox A; Jackson C; Jankovic D; Morton A; Sharples LD; Taylor A
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):182-193. PubMed ID: 34271832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods to elicit beliefs for Bayesian priors: a systematic review.
    Johnson SR; Tomlinson GA; Hawker GA; Granton JT; Feldman BM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 63(4):355-69. PubMed ID: 19716263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eliciting judgements about dependent quantities of interest: The SHeffield ELicitation Framework extension and copula methods illustrated using an asthma case study.
    Holzhauer B; Hampson LV; Gosling JP; Bornkamp B; Kahn J; Lange MR; Luo WL; Brindicci C; Lawrence D; Ballerstedt S; O'Hagan A
    Pharm Stat; 2022 Sep; 21(5):1005-1021. PubMed ID: 35373454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application and Evaluation of an Expert Judgment Elicitation Procedure for Correlations.
    Zondervan-Zwijnenburg M; van de Schoot-Hubeek W; Lek K; Hoijtink H; van de Schoot R
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():90. PubMed ID: 28197115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informing Reimbursement Decisions Using Cost-Effectiveness Modelling: A Guide to the Process of Generating Elicited Priors to Capture Model Uncertainties.
    Bojke L; Grigore B; Jankovic D; Peters J; Soares M; Stein K
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Sep; 35(9):867-877. PubMed ID: 28616775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health technology assessment.
    Hailey D
    Singapore Med J; 2006 Mar; 47(3):187-92; quiz 193. PubMed ID: 16518551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An internet-based method to elicit experts' beliefs for Bayesian priors: a case study in intracranial stent evaluation.
    Pibouleau L; Chevret S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Oct; 30(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 25401304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure.
    Knol AB; Slottje P; van der Sluijs JP; Lebret E
    Environ Health; 2010 Apr; 9():19. PubMed ID: 20420657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. USING EXPERT OPINION IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A GUIDELINE REVIEW.
    Hunger T; Schnell-Inderst P; Sahakyan N; Siebert U
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(3):131-9. PubMed ID: 27502308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expert Elicitation to Inform a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Screening for Renal Cancer.
    Rossi SH; Blick C; Nathan P; Nicol D; Stewart GD; Wilson ECF
    Value Health; 2019 Sep; 22(9):981-987. PubMed ID: 31511187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using expert elicitation to prioritize resource allocation for risk identification for nanosilver.
    Fauss E; Gorman ME; Swami N
    J Law Med Ethics; 2009; 37(4):770-80. PubMed ID: 20122116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proposal for a Five-Step Method to Elicit Expert Judgment.
    Veen D; Stoel D; Zondervan-Zwijnenburg M; van de Schoot R
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2110. PubMed ID: 29259569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of Expert Judgement Across NICE Guidance-Making Programmes: A Review of Current Processes and Suitability of Existing Tools to Support the Use of Expert Elicitation.
    Peel A; Jenks M; Choudhury M; Lovett R; Rejon-Parrilla JC; Sims A; Craig J
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2018 Dec; 16(6):819-836. PubMed ID: 30073485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A valid and reliable belief elicitation method for Bayesian priors.
    Johnson SR; Tomlinson GA; Hawker GA; Granton JT; Grosbein HA; Feldman BM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 63(4):370-83. PubMed ID: 19926253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid response in health technology assessment: a Delphi study for a Brazilian guideline.
    Silva MT; Silva END; Barreto JOM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 29884121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.