These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24105679)
1. Usefulness of the SPACE pulse sequence at 1.5T MR cholangiography: comparison of image quality and image acquisition time with conventional 3D-TSE sequence. Nakaura T; Kidoh M; Maruyama N; Kawahara T; Namimoto T; Sakai Y; Harada K; Yamashita Y J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Nov; 38(5):1014-9. PubMed ID: 24105679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical impact of 3-dimensional balanced turbo-field-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 T: prospective intraindividual comparison with 3-dimensional turbo-spin-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Itatani R; Namimoto T; Takaoka H; Katahira K; Noda S; Toyonari N; Yamashita Y J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25299796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Optimized 3D-SPACE and 3D-TSE Sequences at 1.5T MRCP in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis. Sudholt P; Zaehringer C; Urigo C; Tyndall A; Bongartz G; Hohmann J Rofo; 2015 Jun; 187(6):467-71. PubMed ID: 25877993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid 3D navigator-triggered MR cholangiopancreatography with SPACE sequence at 3T: only one-third acquisition time of conventional 3D SPACE navigator-triggered MRCP. Sun B; Chen Z; Duan Q; Xue Y; Zheng E; He Y; Lin L; Li G; Zhang Z Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jan; 45(1):134-140. PubMed ID: 31781898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-spatial-resolution three-dimensional MR cholangiography using a high-sampling-efficiency technique (SPACE) at 3T: comparison with the conventional constant flip angle sequence in healthy volunteers. Arizono S; Isoda H; Maetani YS; Hirokawa Y; Shimada K; Nakamoto Y; Togashi K J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):685-90. PubMed ID: 18777552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of the Short-Echo Time Cube Sequence at 3-T Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: Prospective Comparison With the Conventional 3-Dimensional Fast Spin-Echo Sequence. Itatani R; Namimoto T; Kusunoki S; Mizuguchi T; Ohtsuka S; Yamashita Y J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 26966952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. T2-weighted MR imaging of the liver: qualitative and quantitative comparison of SPACE MR imaging with turbo spin-echo MR imaging. Dohan A; Gavini JP; Placé V; Sebbag D; Vignaud A; Herbin C; Hamzi L; Boudiaf M; Soyer P Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e655-61. PubMed ID: 23957939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Navigator-triggered prospective acquisition correction (PACE) technique vs. conventional respiratory-triggered technique for free-breathing 3D MRCP: an initial prospective comparative study using healthy volunteers. Morita S; Ueno E; Suzuki K; Machida H; Fujimura M; Kojima S; Hirata M; Ohnishi T; Imura C J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 18777550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High spatial resolution 3D MR cholangiography with high sampling efficiency technique (SPACE): comparison of 3T vs. 1.5T. Arizono S; Isoda H; Maetani YS; Hirokawa Y; Shimada K; Nakamoto Y; Shibata T; Togashi K Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 73(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 18834686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of the navigator-echo triggering technique for free-breathing three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Matsunaga K; Ogasawara G; Tsukano M; Iwadate Y; Inoue Y Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Apr; 31(3):396-400. PubMed ID: 23102944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Feasibility of 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Using Compressed Sensing: Comparison of Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance. Yoon JH; Lee SM; Kang HJ; Weiland E; Raithel E; Son Y; Kiefer B; Lee JM Invest Radiol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):612-619. PubMed ID: 28448309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of SPACE and 3D TSE MRCP at 1.5T focusing on difference in echo spacing. Morita S; Ueno E; Masukawa A; Suzuki K; Machida H; Fujimura M; Kojima S; Hirata M; Ohnishi T; Kitajima K; Kaji Y Magn Reson Med Sci; 2009; 8(3):101-5. PubMed ID: 19783873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T. Lee S; Jee WH; Jung JY; Lee SY; Ryu KS; Ha KY Acta Radiol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24553584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with GRASE sequence at 3.0T: does it improve image quality and acquisition time as compared with 3D TSE? Yoshida M; Nakaura T; Inoue T; Tanoue S; Takada S; Utsunomiya D; Tsumagari S; Harada K; Yamashita Y Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2436-2443. PubMed ID: 29335869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness of 3D hybrid profile order technique with 3T magnetic resonance cholangiography: Comparison of image quality and acquisition time. Yokoyama K; Nakaura T; Iyama Y; Sakamoto S; Takemura A; Okuaki T; Harada K; Yamashita Y J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Nov; 44(5):1346-1353. PubMed ID: 27131338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. N/2 ghosting artifacts: elimination at 3.0-T MR cholangiography with SPACE pulse sequence. Haystead CM; Dale BM; Merkle EM Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):589-95. PubMed ID: 18227547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D-MRI of the ankle with optimized 3D-SPACE. Notohamiprodjo M; Kuschel B; Horng A; Paul D; Baer P; Li G; Garcia del Olmo JM; Reiser MF; Glaser C Invest Radiol; 2012 Apr; 47(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 22373531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biliary anatomy on 3D MRCP: Comparison of volume-rendering and maximum-intensity-projection algorithms. Morita S; Saito N; Suzuki K; Mitsuhashi N J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Mar; 29(3):601-6. PubMed ID: 19243055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-Dimensional Breath-Hold MRCP Using SPACE Pulse Sequence at 3 T: Comparison With Conventional Navigator-Triggered Technique. Chen Z; Sun B; Duan Q; Xue Y; Zheng E; He Y; Li G AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Dec; 213(6):1247-1252. PubMed ID: 31386572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients. Onishi H; Kim T; Hori M; Murakami T; Tatsumi M; Nakaya Y; Nakamoto A; Osuga K; Tomoda K; Nakamura H Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):559-65. PubMed ID: 19692840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]