These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24106170)

  • 1. Assessing near infrared optical properties of ceramic orthodontic brackets using cross-polarization optical coherence tomography.
    Isfeld DM; Aparicio C; Jones RS
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2014 Apr; 102(3):516-23. PubMed ID: 24106170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Light energy transmission through six different makes of ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Aldossary MS; Abu Hajia SS; Santini A
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):638-651. PubMed ID: 30385291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optical coherence tomography as a non-invasive method of enamel thickness diagnosis after orthodontic treatment by 3 different types of brackets.
    Machoy ME; Koprowski R; Szyszka-Sommerfeld L; Safranow K; Gedrange T; Woźniak K
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Feb; 28(2):211-218. PubMed ID: 30048049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polymerization efficiency of chemically cured and visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives: degree of cure.
    Eliades T; Eliades G; Brantley WA; Johnston WM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):294-301. PubMed ID: 7661147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bond strength of ceramic brackets with various bonding systems.
    Chaconas SJ; Caputo AA; Niu GS
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 2012320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The critical bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to dental glass-ceramics.
    Di Guida LA; Benetti P; Corazza PH; Della Bona A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Dec; 23(12):4345-4353. PubMed ID: 30953165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical characterization of aesthetic orthodontic brackets by the dynamic indentation method.
    Iwasaki T; Nagata S; Ishikawa T; Tanimoto Y
    Dent Mater J; 2022 Nov; 41(6):860-867. PubMed ID: 35934802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frictional forces and surface topography of a new ceramic bracket.
    Tanne K; Matsubara S; Hotei Y; Sakuda M; Yoshida M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 8074092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wire friction from ceramic brackets during simulated canine retraction.
    Tanne K; Matsubara S; Shibaguchi T; Sakuda M
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):285-90; discussion 291-2. PubMed ID: 1763839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laser debonding of ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Tocchio RM; Williams PT; Mayer FJ; Standing KG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Feb; 103(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 8427220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laser-aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets.
    Strobl K; Bahns TL; Willham L; Bishara SE; Stwalley WC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Feb; 101(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 1531397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface characterization of ceramic brackets: a multitechnique approach.
    Eliades T; Lekka M; Eliades G; Brantley WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jan; 105(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 8291484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ceramic bracket design: an analysis using the finite element method.
    Ghosh J; Nanda RS; Duncanson MG; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Dec; 108(6):575-82. PubMed ID: 7503034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Zirconia brackets: an evaluation of morphology and coefficients of friction.
    Keith O; Kusy RP; Whitley JQ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Dec; 106(6):605-14. PubMed ID: 7977206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The fracture strength of ceramic brackets: a comparative study.
    Flores DA; Caruso JM; Scott GE; Jeiroudi MT
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 2256564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The friction behavior of the ceramic bracket in arch wire-guided tooth movement].
    Schumacher HA; Bourauel C; Drescher D
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1990 Oct; 51(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 2262178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro study of color stability of polycrystalline and monocrystalline ceramic brackets.
    de Oliveira CB; Maia LG; Santos-Pinto A; Gandini Junior LG
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(4):114-21. PubMed ID: 25279530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study of force loss due to friction comparing two ceramic brackets during sliding tooth movement.
    AlSubaie M; Talic N; Khawatmi S; Alobeid A; Bourauel C; El-Bialy T
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Sep; 77(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 27384715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.