These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24106262)

  • 1. Coercion in a locked psychiatric ward: Perspectives of patients and staff.
    Larsen IB; Terkelsen TB
    Nurs Ethics; 2014 Jun; 21(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 24106262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fear, danger and aggression in a Norwegian locked psychiatric ward: Dialogue and ethics of care as contributions to combating difficult situations.
    Terkelsen TB; Larsen IB
    Nurs Ethics; 2016 May; 23(3):308-17. PubMed ID: 25552587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical challenges of seclusion in psychiatric inpatient wards: a qualitative study of the experiences of Norwegian mental health professionals.
    W Haugom E; Ruud T; Hynnekleiv T
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Nov; 19(1):879. PubMed ID: 31752958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics.
    Husum TL; Bjørngaard JH; Finset A; Ruud T
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2010 Apr; 10():89. PubMed ID: 20370928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coercion in psychiatry: A cross-sectional study on staff views and emotions.
    Krieger E; Moritz S; Lincoln TM; Fischer R; Nagel M
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2021 Apr; 28(2):149-162. PubMed ID: 32348607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experiences of involuntary psychiatric admission decision-making: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of the perspectives of service users, informal carers, and professionals.
    Sugiura K; Pertega E; Holmberg C
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 73():101645. PubMed ID: 33246221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nurses' experiences of informal coercion on adult psychiatric wards.
    Andersson U; Fathollahi J; Gustin LW
    Nurs Ethics; 2020 May; 27(3):741-753. PubMed ID: 31898470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does coercion matter? Supporting young next-of-kin in mental health care.
    Martinsen EH; Weimand B; Norvoll R
    Nurs Ethics; 2020 Aug; 27(5):1270-1281. PubMed ID: 31500502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patients' moral views on coercion in mental healthcare.
    Norvoll R; Pedersen R
    Nurs Ethics; 2018 Sep; 25(6):796-807. PubMed ID: 27789846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protocol for the Lovisenberg Open Acute Door Study (LOADS): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial to compare safety and coercion between open-door policy and usual-care services in acute psychiatric inpatients.
    Kunøe N; Nussle HM; Indregard AM
    BMJ Open; 2022 Feb; 12(2):e058501. PubMed ID: 35173011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Extralegal coercive measures in psychiatric wards-- patients' perspectives].
    Jensen HM; Poulsen HD
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Feb; 168(6):578-80. PubMed ID: 16476219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethical challenges in connection with the use of coercion: a focus group study of health care personnel in mental health care.
    Hem MH; Molewijk B; Pedersen R
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Dec; 15():82. PubMed ID: 25475895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informal coercion in acute inpatient setting--knowledge and attitudes held by mental health professionals.
    Jaeger M; Ketteler D; Rabenschlag F; Theodoridou A
    Psychiatry Res; 2014 Dec; 220(3):1007-11. PubMed ID: 25249438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of nursing staff attitudes and characteristics on the use of coercive measures in acute mental health services-A systematic review.
    Doedens P; Vermeulen J; Boyette LL; Latour C; de Haan L
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2020 Aug; 27(4):446-459. PubMed ID: 31876970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Locked doors: a survey of patients, staff and visitors.
    Bowers L; Haglund K; Muir-Cochrane E; Nijman H; Simpson A; Van Der Merwe M
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2010 Dec; 17(10):873-80. PubMed ID: 21078002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Treat me with respect". A systematic review and thematic analysis of psychiatric patients' reported perceptions of the situations associated with the process of coercion.
    Tingleff EB; Bradley SK; Gildberg FA; Munksgaard G; Hounsgaard L
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2017 Nov; 24(9-10):681-698. PubMed ID: 28665512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cross-sectional study of experienced coercion in adolescent mental health inpatients.
    Nyttingnes O; Ruud T; Norvoll R; Rugkåsa J; Hanssen-Bauer K
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 May; 18(1):389. PubMed ID: 29848338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coercion in nursing homes: Perspectives of patients and relatives.
    Gjerberg E; Lillemoen L; Pedersen R; Førde R
    Nurs Ethics; 2016 May; 23(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 25566815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Case Study: Seclusion and Restraint in Psychiatric Care.
    Goulet MH; Larue C
    Clin Nurs Res; 2018 Sep; 27(7):853-870. PubMed ID: 28608713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microdecisions instead of coercion: patient participation and self-perceived discrimination in a psychiatric ward.
    Edin Renberg F; Sandlund M
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 73(8):532-538. PubMed ID: 31524552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.