These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24106484)

  • 1. Multinomial tree models for assessing the status of the reference in studies of the accuracy of tools for binary classification.
    Botella J; Huang H; Suero M
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():694. PubMed ID: 24106484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis of the accuracy of tools used for binary classification when the primary studies employ different references.
    Botella J; Huang H; Suero M
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):331-41. PubMed ID: 24773361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - An update.
    Umemneku Chikere CM; Wilson K; Graziadio S; Vale L; Allen AJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223832. PubMed ID: 31603953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect reference standard - a comparison of correction methods.
    Umemneku Chikere CM; Wilson KJ; Allen AJ; Vale L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):67. PubMed ID: 33845775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias in estimating accuracy of a binary screening test with differential disease verification.
    Alonzo TA; Brinton JT; Ringham BM; Glueck DH
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1852-64. PubMed ID: 21495059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary tests with an imperfect reference standard.
    Albert PS
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):780-97. PubMed ID: 19101935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
    Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy: A "Rule of Three" for data with repeated observations but without a gold standard.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(22):4815-4829. PubMed ID: 34161623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating and comparing diagnostic tests' accuracy when the gold standard is not binary.
    Obuchowski NA
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Sep; 12(9):1198-204. PubMed ID: 16099683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods.
    Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Coomarasamy A; Khan KS; Bossuyt PM
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Dec; 11(50):iii, ix-51. PubMed ID: 18021577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Random Effects Models in a Meta-Analysis of the Accuracy of Two Diagnostic Tests Without a Gold Standard.
    Chu H; Chen S; Louis TA
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2009 Jun; 104(486):512-523. PubMed ID: 19562044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different latent class models were used and evaluated for assessing the accuracy of campylobacter diagnostic tests: overcoming imperfect reference standards?
    Asselineau J; Paye A; Bessède E; Perez P; Proust-Lima C
    Epidemiol Infect; 2018 Sep; 146(12):1556-1564. PubMed ID: 29945689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard.
    Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Khan KS; Coomarasamy A; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 19447581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A hierarchical Bayesian approach for handling missing classification data.
    Ketz AC; Johnson TL; Hooten MB; Hobbs NT
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Mar; 9(6):3130-3140. PubMed ID: 30962886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correcting for the Absence of a Gold Standard Improves Diagnostic Accuracy of Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease.
    Coart E; Barrado LG; Duits FH; Scheltens P; van der Flier WM; Teunissen CE; van der Vies SM; Burzykowski T;
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2015; 46(4):889-99. PubMed ID: 25869788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extending Hui-Walter framework to correlated outcomes with application to diagnosis tests of an eye disease among premature infants.
    Liu YL; Ying GS; Quinn GE; Zhou XH; Chen Y
    Stat Med; 2022 Feb; 41(3):433-448. PubMed ID: 34859902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Challenges in the real world use of classification accuracy metrics: From recall and precision to the Matthews correlation coefficient.
    Foody GM
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0291908. PubMed ID: 37792898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.