457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24107284)
1. Enhanced vascular endothelial growth factor and inflammatory cytokine removal with online hemodiafiltration over high-flux hemodialysis in sepsis-related acute kidney injury patients.
Chancharoenthana W; Tiranathanagul K; Srisawat N; Susantitaphong P; Leelahavanichkul A; Praditpornsilpa K; Tungsanga K; Eiam-Ong S
Ther Apher Dial; 2013 Oct; 17(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 24107284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mortality and cardiovascular events in online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) compared with high-flux dialysis: results from the Turkish OL-HDF Study.
Ok E; Asci G; Toz H; Ok ES; Kircelli F; Yilmaz M; Hur E; Demirci MS; Demirci C; Duman S; Basci A; Adam SM; Isik IO; Zengin M; Suleymanlar G; Yilmaz ME; Ozkahya M;
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2013 Jan; 28(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 23229932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can dialysis modality influence quality of life in chronic hemodialysis patients? Low-flux hemodialysis versus high-flux hemodiafiltration: a cross-over study.
Kantartzi K; Panagoutsos S; Mourvati E; Roumeliotis A; Leivaditis K; Devetzis V; Passadakis P; Vargemezis V
Ren Fail; 2013; 35(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 23176401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acute intradialytic cardiac function and inflammatory cytokine changes during high-efficiency online hemodiafiltration with acetate-free and standard dialysis solutions.
Tiranathanagul K; Tangvoraphonkchai K; Srisawat N; Susantitaphong P; Tungsanga K; Praditpornsilpa K; Eiam-Ong S
Ther Apher Dial; 2015 Jun; 19(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 25545821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intermittent Online Postdilution Hemodiafiltration versus High-Flux Hemodialysis in Non-critical Acute Kidney Injury: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Nayak S; Prabhahar A; Chaudhary M; Bahuguna P; Yadav AK; Kumar V; Rathi M; Kohli HS; Gupta KL; Ramachandran R
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2022 Sep; 33(5):674-687. PubMed ID: 37955459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On-line hemodiafiltration does not induce inflammatory response in end-stage renal disease patients: results from a multicenter cross-over study.
Vaslaki LR; Berta K; Major L; Weber V; Weber C; Wojke R; Passlick-Deetjen J; Falkenhagen D
Artif Organs; 2005 May; 29(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 15854217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acute hemodynamic response and uremic toxin removal in conventional and extended hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration: a randomized crossover study.
Cornelis T; van der Sande FM; Eloot S; Cardinaels E; Bekers O; Damoiseaux J; Leunissen KM; Kooman JP
Am J Kidney Dis; 2014 Aug; 64(2):247-56. PubMed ID: 24698199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-Dose Versus Conventional-Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration and Patient and Kidney Survival and Cytokine Removal in Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Park JT; Lee H; Kee YK; Park S; Oh HJ; Han SH; Joo KW; Lim CS; Kim YS; Kang SW; Yoo TH; Kim DK;
Am J Kidney Dis; 2016 Oct; 68(4):599-608. PubMed ID: 27084247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Randomized, Single-Blind, Crossover Trial of Recovery Time in High-Flux Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration.
Smith JR; Zimmer N; Bell E; Francq BG; McConnachie A; Mactier R
Am J Kidney Dis; 2017 Jun; 69(6):762-770. PubMed ID: 28024931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reprocessing high-flux polysulfone dialyzers does not negatively impact solute removal in short-daily online hemodiafiltration.
Melo NC; Moyses RM; Elias RM; Castro MC
Hemodial Int; 2014 Apr; 18(2):473-80. PubMed ID: 24393428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Matching efficacy of online hemodiafiltration in simple hemodialysis mode.
Krieter DH; Hunn E; Morgenroth A; Lemke HD; Wanner C
Artif Organs; 2008 Dec; 32(12):903-9. PubMed ID: 19133017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of convective-controlled double high-flux hemodiafiltration versus on-line hemodiafiltration: 1-year prospective study.
Susantitaphong P; Tiranathanagul K; Katavetin P; Townamchai N; Praditpornsilpa K; Tungsanga K; Eiam-Ong S
Blood Purif; 2010; 29(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 19907162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment tolerance and patient-reported outcomes favor online hemodiafiltration compared to high-flux hemodialysis in the elderly.
Morena M; Jaussent A; Chalabi L; Leray-Moragues H; Chenine L; Debure A; Thibaudin D; Azzouz L; Patrier L; Maurice F; Nicoud P; Durand C; Seigneuric B; Dupuy AM; Picot MC; Cristol JP; Canaud B;
Kidney Int; 2017 Jun; 91(6):1495-1509. PubMed ID: 28318624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between on-line high-efficiency hemodiafiltration and conventional high-flux hemodialysis for polyclonal free light chain removal.
Lamy T; Henri P; Lobbedez T; Comby E; Ryckelynck JP; Ficheux M
Blood Purif; 2014; 37(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 24603634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of high-flux hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration on serum C-terminal agrin fragment levels in end-stage renal disease patients.
Steubl D; Hettwer S; Dahinden P; Wolf P; Luppa P; Wagner CA; Küchle C; Schmaderer C; Renders L; Heemann U; Roos M
Transl Res; 2014 Nov; 164(5):392-9. PubMed ID: 24907476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Clinical Significance of Intermittent Infusion Hemodiafiltration Using Backfiltration of Ultrapure Dialysis Fluid Compared to Hemodialysis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.
Mineshima M; Takahashi S; Tomo T; Kawanishi H; Kawaguchi H; Minakuchi J; Nakanishi T; Sato T; Nitta K; Tsuchiya K; Masakane I; Itami N
Blood Purif; 2019; 48(4):368-381. PubMed ID: 31311018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects on inflammatory and nutritional markers of haemodiafiltration with online regeneration of ultrafiltrate (HFR) vs online haemodiafiltration: a cross-over randomized multicentre trial.
Panichi V; Manca-Rizza G; Paoletti S; Taccola D; Consani C; Filippi C; Mantuano E; Sidoti A; Grazi G; Antonelli A; Angelini D; Petrone I; Mura C; Tolaini P; Saloi F; Ghezzi PM; Barsotti G; Palla R
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Mar; 21(3):756-62. PubMed ID: 16303780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pilot study to assess increased dialysis efficiency in patients with limited blood flow rates due to vascular access problems.
Mandolfo S; Borlandelli S; Imbasciati E; Badalamenti S; Graziani G; Sereni L; Varesani M; Wratten ML; Corsi A; Elli A
Hemodial Int; 2008 Jan; 12(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 18271842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FGF-23 removal is improved by on-line high-efficiency hemodiafiltration compared to conventional high flux hemodialysis.
Patrier L; Dupuy AM; Granger Vallée A; Chalabi L; Morena M; Canaud B; Cristol JP
J Nephrol; 2013; 26(2):342-9. PubMed ID: 22573526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Osteocalcin and myoglobin removal in on-line hemodiafiltration versus low- and high-flux hemodialysis.
Maduell F; Navarro V; Cruz MC; Torregrosa E; Garcia D; Simon V; Ferrero JA
Am J Kidney Dis; 2002 Sep; 40(3):582-9. PubMed ID: 12200811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
