These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24107370)

  • 21. Interspecific allometry for sexual shape dimorphism: Macroevolution of multivariate sexual phenotypes with application to Rensch's rule.
    Adams DC; Glynne E; Kaliontzopoulou A
    Evolution; 2020 Sep; 74(9):1908-1922. PubMed ID: 32578880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sexual size dimorphism in caecilian amphibians: analysis, review and directions for future research.
    Kupfer A
    Zoology (Jena); 2009; 112(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 19433349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Only half right: species with female-biased sexual size dimorphism consistently break Rensch's rule.
    Webb TJ; Freckleton RP
    PLoS One; 2007 Sep; 2(9):e897. PubMed ID: 17878932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Allometry for Sexual Size Dimorphism in Stoneflies Defies the Rensch's Rule.
    Guillermo-Ferreira R; Novaes MC; Lecci LS; Bispo PC
    Neotrop Entomol; 2014 Apr; 43(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 27193524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Patterns of sexual size dimorphism in horseshoe bats: Testing Rensch's rule and potential causes.
    Wu H; Jiang T; Huang X; Feng J
    Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):2616. PubMed ID: 29422495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rensch's rule: linking intraspecific to evolutionary allometry.
    Reyes-Puig C; Adams DC; Enriquez-Urzelai U; Kaliontzopoulou A
    Evolution; 2023 Dec; 77(12):2576-2589. PubMed ID: 37738625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sexual selection explains sex-specific growth plasticity and positive allometry for sexual size dimorphism in a reef fish.
    Walker SP; McCormick MI
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Sep; 276(1671):3335-43. PubMed ID: 19553253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Female-biased gape and body-size dimorphism in the New World watersnakes (tribe: Thamnophiini) oppose predictions from Rensch's rule.
    Burbrink FT; Futterman I
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Sep; 9(17):9624-9633. PubMed ID: 31534680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Domestic chickens defy Rensch's rule: sexual size dimorphism in chicken breeds.
    Remeš V; Székely T
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Dec; 23(12):2754-9. PubMed ID: 21121089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can sexual selection drive female life histories? A comparative study on Galliform birds.
    Kolm N; Stein RW; Mooers AØ; Verspoor JJ; Cunningham EJ
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 20(2):627-38. PubMed ID: 17305829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The macroevolutionary dynamics of mammalian sexual size dimorphism.
    Jones ME; Sheard C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Nov; 290(2011):20231211. PubMed ID: 37964522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evolution of sexual dimorphism and Rensch's rule in the beetle genus
    Rudoy A; Ribera I
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3060. PubMed ID: 28286715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sharks Violate Rensch's Rule for Sexual Size Dimorphism.
    Gayford JH; Sternes PC
    Integr Org Biol; 2024; 6(1):obae025. PubMed ID: 39011350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sexual selection on male size drives the evolution of male-biased sexual size dimorphism via the prolongation of male development.
    Rohner PT; Blanckenhorn WU; Puniamoorthy N
    Evolution; 2016 Jun; 70(6):1189-99. PubMed ID: 27168489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Population variation in sexual selection and its effect on size allometry in two dung fly species with contrasting sexual size dimorphism.
    Kraushaar U; Blanckenhorn WU
    Evolution; 2002 Feb; 56(2):307-21. PubMed ID: 11926499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Allometry of sexual size dimorphism in turtles: a comparison of mass and length data.
    Regis KW; Meik JM
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e2914. PubMed ID: 28149687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sexual size dimorphism in anurans fails to obey Rensch's rule.
    Liao WB; Zeng Y; Zhou CQ; Jehle R
    Front Zool; 2013 Mar; 10(1):10. PubMed ID: 23496925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Size-dependent selective mechanisms on males and females and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in frogs.
    Nali RC; Zamudio KR; Haddad CF; Prado CP
    Am Nat; 2014 Dec; 184(6):727-40. PubMed ID: 25438173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The evolution of fecundity is associated with female body size but not female-biased sexual size dimorphism among frogs.
    Monroe MJ; South SH; Alonzo SH
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1793-803. PubMed ID: 26189727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Strong support for Rensch's rule in an American clade of lizards (Teiidae and Gymnophtalmidae) and a paradox of the largest tejus.
    Frýdlová P; Frynta D
    Naturwissenschaften; 2015 Jun; 102(5-6):23. PubMed ID: 25876853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.