137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24108304)
1. Dynamics of imprinted DNA methylation and gene transcription for imprinting establishment in mouse oocytes in relation to culture duration variability.
Anckaert E; Sánchez F; Billooye K; Smitz J
Biol Reprod; 2013 Dec; 89(6):130. PubMed ID: 24108304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The loss of imprinted DNA methylation in mouse blastocysts is inflicted to a similar extent by in vitro follicle culture and ovulation induction.
Saenz-de-Juano MD; Billooye K; Smitz J; Anckaert E
Mol Hum Reprod; 2016 Jun; 22(6):427-41. PubMed ID: 26908643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ammonium accumulation and use of mineral oil overlay do not alter imprinting establishment at three key imprinted genes in mouse oocytes grown and matured in a long-term follicle culture.
Anckaert E; Adriaenssens T; Romero S; Smitz J
Biol Reprod; 2009 Oct; 81(4):666-73. PubMed ID: 19494252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of low methyl donor levels in culture medium during mouse follicle culture on oocyte imprinting establishment.
Anckaert E; Romero S; Adriaenssens T; Smitz J
Biol Reprod; 2010 Sep; 83(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 20393167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bovine DNA methylation imprints are established in an oocyte size-specific manner, which are coordinated with the expression of the DNMT3 family proteins.
O'Doherty AM; O'Shea LC; Fair T
Biol Reprod; 2012 Mar; 86(3):67. PubMed ID: 22088914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Human in vitro oocyte maturation is not associated with increased imprinting error rates at LIT1, SNRPN, PEG3 and GTL2.
Kuhtz J; Romero S; De Vos M; Smitz J; Haaf T; Anckaert E
Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1995-2005. PubMed ID: 24963167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oocyte growth-dependent progression of maternal imprinting in mice.
Hiura H; Obata Y; Komiyama J; Shirai M; Kono T
Genes Cells; 2006 Apr; 11(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 16611239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unaltered imprinting establishment of key imprinted genes in mouse oocytes after in vitro follicle culture under variable follicle-stimulating hormone exposure.
Anckaert E; Adriaenssens T; Romero S; Dremier S; Smitz J
Int J Dev Biol; 2009; 53(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 19247969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA integrity, growth pattern, spindle formation, chromosomal constitution and imprinting patterns of mouse oocytes from vitrified pre-antral follicles.
Trapphoff T; El Hajj N; Zechner U; Haaf T; Eichenlaub-Ritter U
Hum Reprod; 2010 Dec; 25(12):3025-42. PubMed ID: 20940142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methylation dynamics of imprinted genes in mouse germ cells.
Lucifero D; Mertineit C; Clarke HJ; Bestor TH; Trasler JM
Genomics; 2002 Apr; 79(4):530-8. PubMed ID: 11944985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Forced expression of DNA methyltransferases during oocyte growth accelerates the establishment of methylation imprints but not functional genomic imprinting.
Hara S; Takano T; Fujikawa T; Yamada M; Wakai T; Kono T; Obata Y
Hum Mol Genet; 2014 Jul; 23(14):3853-64. PubMed ID: 24599402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Loss of methylation imprint of Snrpn in postovulatory aging mouse oocyte.
Liang XW; Zhu JQ; Miao YL; Liu JH; Wei L; Lu SS; Hou Y; Schatten H; Lu KH; Sun QY
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2008 Jun; 371(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 18381202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Epigenetic profile of developmentally important genes in bovine oocytes.
Heinzmann J; Hansmann T; Herrmann D; Wrenzycki C; Zechner U; Haaf T; Niemann H
Mol Reprod Dev; 2011 Mar; 78(3):188-201. PubMed ID: 21290475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of oocyte vitrification on deoxyribonucleic acid methylation of H19, Peg3, and Snrpn differentially methylated regions in mouse blastocysts.
Cheng KR; Fu XW; Zhang RN; Jia GX; Hou YP; Zhu SE
Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):1183-1190.e3. PubMed ID: 25064401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Culture of oocytes and risk of imprinting defects.
Anckaert E; De Rycke M; Smitz J
Hum Reprod Update; 2013; 19(1):52-66. PubMed ID: 23054129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro follicular growth affects oocyte imprinting establishment in mice.
Kerjean A; Couvert P; Heams T; Chalas C; Poirier K; Chelly J; Jouannet P; Paldi A; Poirot C
Eur J Hum Genet; 2003 Jul; 11(7):493-6. PubMed ID: 12825069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Establishment of in-vitro mouse preantral follicle culture systems].
Wan X; Zhu Y; Ma X; Zhu J
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2009 Mar; 38(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19408655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of long-term in vitro exposure to phosphodiesterase type-3 inhibitors on follicle and oocyte development.
Nogueira D; Cortvrindt R; Everaerdt B; Smitz J
Reproduction; 2005 Aug; 130(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 16049155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of oocyte-specific transcripts in follicle-enclosed oocytes during antral development and maturation in vitro.
Sánchez F; Adriaenssens T; Romero S; Smitz J
Mol Hum Reprod; 2009 Sep; 15(9):539-50. PubMed ID: 19553355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Side-by-side comparison of five commercial media systems in a mouse model: suboptimal in vitro culture interferes with imprint maintenance.
Market-Velker BA; Fernandes AD; Mann MR
Biol Reprod; 2010 Dec; 83(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 20702853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]