These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24108576)

  • 41. Trust but verify: The biasing effects of witness opinions and background knowledge in workplace investigations.
    MacLean CL; Miller GS
    J Safety Res; 2024 Jun; 89():33-40. PubMed ID: 38858057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Alone in a crowd of sheep: asymmetric perceptions of conformity and their roots in an introspection illusion.
    Pronin E; Berger J; Molouki S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Apr; 92(4):585-95. PubMed ID: 17469946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Memory as power: who is to decide?
    Beahrs JO
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):462-70. PubMed ID: 10509945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Memory at the Sharp End: The Costs of Remembering With Others in Forensic Contexts.
    Hope L; Gabbert F
    Top Cogn Sci; 2019 Oct; 11(4):609-626. PubMed ID: 30073777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Police Decision-Making in the Absence of Evidence-Based Guidelines: Assessment of Alcohol-Intoxicated Eyewitnesses.
    Pettersson D; Bergquist M; Hagsand AV
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():761956. PubMed ID: 35185717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Does post-identification feedback affect evaluations of eyewitness testimony and identification procedures?
    Douglass AB; Neuschatz JS; Imrich J; Wilkinson M
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Aug; 34(4):282-94. PubMed ID: 19585229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Peer influence on event reports among adolescents and young adults.
    McGuire K; London K; Wright DB
    Memory; 2011 Aug; 19(6):674-83. PubMed ID: 21919594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Protecting against misinformation: Evaluating the effectiveness of three techniques to reduce memory conformity.
    Kękuś M; Dziubańska R; Michalak K; Polczyk R; Szpitalak M; Barzykowski K
    Br J Psychol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38780973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Children as alibi witnesses: the effect of age and confidence on mock-juror decision making.
    Fawcett H; Winstanley K
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(6):957-971. PubMed ID: 31984060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Witnesses' memory for events and faces under elevated levels of intoxication.
    Altman CM; Schreiber Compo N; McQuiston D; Hagsand AV; Cervera J
    Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):946-959. PubMed ID: 29504452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Eye-witness memory and suggestibility in children with Asperger syndrome.
    McCrory E; Henry LA; Happé F
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2007 May; 48(5):482-9. PubMed ID: 17501729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. I saw it for longer than you: the relationship between perceived encoding duration and memory conformity.
    Gabbert F; Memon A; Wright DB
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 16764812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Relative - not absolute - judgments of credibility affect susceptibility to misinformation conveyed during discussion.
    French L; Garry M; Mori K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 21112042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Reevaluating the potency of the memory conformity effect.
    Bodner GE; Musch E; Azad T
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Dec; 37(8):1069-76. PubMed ID: 19933452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The cognitive interview: is its benefit affected by the level of witness emotion?
    Ginet M; Verkampt F
    Memory; 2007 May; 15(4):450-64. PubMed ID: 17469023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Witness-Aimed First Account (WAFA): A new technique for interviewing autistic witnesses and victims.
    Maras K; Dando C; Stephenson H; Lambrechts A; Anns S; Gaigg S
    Autism; 2020 Aug; 24(6):1449-1467. PubMed ID: 32168990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Social influences on reality-monitoring decisions.
    Hoffman HG; Granhag PA; Kwong See ST; Loftus EF
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Apr; 29(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 11407416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Perceptions of familiar and unfamiliar ear- and eyewitnesses.
    Harvey MB; Bruer KC; Price HL
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2022; 29(3):395-412. PubMed ID: 35756706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The psychologically vulnerable witness: an emerging forensic consulting role.
    Simon RI
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 11302383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparing the influence of directly vs. indirectly encountered post-event misinformation on eyewitness remembering.
    Blank H; Ost J; Davies J; Jones G; Lambert K; Salmon K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):635-41. PubMed ID: 24184995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.