244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24109443)
1. Opioidergic and dopaminergic manipulation of gambling tendencies: a preliminary study in male recreational gamblers.
Porchet RI; Boekhoudt L; Studer B; Gandamaneni PK; Rani N; Binnamangala S; Müller U; Clark L
Front Behav Neurosci; 2013; 7():138. PubMed ID: 24109443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrophysiological correlates of near outcome and outcome sequence processing in problem gamblers and controls.
Ulrich N; Hewig J
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):379-392. PubMed ID: 29111453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of alcohol on sequential decision-making biases during gambling.
Tobias-Webb J; Limbrick-Oldfield EH; Vearncombe S; Duka T; Clark L
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2020 Feb; 237(2):395-407. PubMed ID: 31664479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amplified Striatal Responses to Near-Miss Outcomes in Pathological Gamblers.
Sescousse G; Janssen LK; Hashemi MM; Timmer MH; Geurts DE; Ter Huurne NP; Clark L; Cools R
Neuropsychopharmacology; 2016 Sep; 41(10):2614-23. PubMed ID: 27006113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Haloperidol modifies instrumental aspects of slot machine gambling in pathological gamblers and healthy controls.
Tremblay AM; Desmond RC; Poulos CX; Zack M
Addict Biol; 2011 Jul; 16(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 20331559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cognitive distortions and gambling near-misses in Internet Gaming Disorder: A preliminary study.
Wu Y; Sescousse G; Yu H; Clark L; Li H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191110. PubMed ID: 29346434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Striatal connectivity changes following gambling wins and near-misses: Associations with gambling severity.
van Holst RJ; Chase HW; Clark L
Neuroimage Clin; 2014; 5():232-9. PubMed ID: 25068112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Damage to insula abolishes cognitive distortions during simulated gambling.
Clark L; Studer B; Bruss J; Tranel D; Bechara A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Apr; 111(16):6098-103. PubMed ID: 24711387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gambling severity predicts midbrain response to near-miss outcomes.
Chase HW; Clark L
J Neurosci; 2010 May; 30(18):6180-7. PubMed ID: 20445043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A D2 antagonist enhances the rewarding and priming effects of a gambling episode in pathological gamblers.
Zack M; Poulos CX
Neuropsychopharmacology; 2007 Aug; 32(8):1678-86. PubMed ID: 17203013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impulsivity and cognitive distortions in pathological gamblers attending the UK National Problem Gambling Clinic: a preliminary report.
Michalczuk R; Bowden-Jones H; Verdejo-Garcia A; Clark L
Psychol Med; 2011 Dec; 41(12):2625-35. PubMed ID: 21733207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impulsivity moderates the effects of dopamine D2 and mixed D1-D2 antagonists in individuals with gambling disorder.
Zack M; Lobo D; Biback C; Fang T; Smart K; Tatone D; Kalia A; Digiacomo D; Kennedy JL
J Psychopharmacol; 2019 Aug; 33(8):1015-1029. PubMed ID: 31219367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Brain oscillatory activity of skill and chance gamblers during a slot machine game.
Alicart H; Mas-Herrero E; Rifà-Ros X; Cucurell D; Marco-Pallarés J
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 19(6):1509-1520. PubMed ID: 30993539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Autonomic responses during Gambling: the Effect of Outcome Type and Sex in a large community sample of young adults.
Hultman C; Vadlin S; Rehn M; Sescousse G; Nilsson KW; Åslund C
J Gambl Stud; 2023 Mar; 39(1):159-182. PubMed ID: 35397748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Near miss, gambler's fallacy and entrapment: their influence on lottery gamblers in Thailand.
Ariyabuddhiphongs V; Phengphol V
J Gambl Stud; 2008 Sep; 24(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 18512133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mixed Emotions to Near-Miss Outcomes: A Psychophysiological Study with Facial Electromyography.
Sharman S; Clark L
J Gambl Stud; 2016 Sep; 32(3):823-34. PubMed ID: 26482890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Assessment of the Validity of the Gamblers Belief Questionnaire.
Philander KS; Gainsbury SM; Grattan G
Addict Behav; 2019 Oct; 97():104-110. PubMed ID: 31176882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games.
Myrseth H; Brunborg GS; Eidem M
J Gambl Stud; 2010 Dec; 26(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 20169466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physiological responses to near-miss outcomes and personal control during simulated gambling.
Clark L; Crooks B; Clarke R; Aitken MR; Dunn BD
J Gambl Stud; 2012 Mar; 28(1):123-37. PubMed ID: 21516368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Latent class analysis of gambling subtypes and impulsive/compulsive associations: Time to rethink diagnostic boundaries for gambling disorder?
Chamberlain SR; Stochl J; Redden SA; Odlaug BL; Grant JE
Addict Behav; 2017 Sep; 72():79-85. PubMed ID: 28384607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
