These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24109871)

  • 1. Effective digitized spatial size of unit dipole field in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.
    Murashima M; Ueno T; Sugimoto N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1049-52. PubMed ID: 24109871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Research Progress of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in MRI].
    Wang S; Duan C; Zhang P; Wang C; Liu X; Li H; Cheng J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 32(5):1131-4. PubMed ID: 26964324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphology-adaptive total variation for the reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility map from the magnetic resonance imaging phase.
    Guo L; Mei Y; Guan J; Tan X; Xu Y; Chen W; Feng Q; Feng Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196922. PubMed ID: 29738526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Algorithms: Mathematical Rationale and Computational Implementations.
    Kee Y; Liu Z; Zhou L; Dimov A; Cho J; de Rochefort L; Seo JK; Wang Y
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2531-2545. PubMed ID: 28885147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Contrast Mechanisms and Clinical Applications.
    Liu C; Wei H; Gong NJ; Cronin M; Dibb R; Decker K
    Tomography; 2015 Sep; 1(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 26844301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain.
    Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z
    J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of densely sampled dipole field on quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Umemoto Y; Murashima M; Ueno T; Sugimoto N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():2352-5. PubMed ID: 25570461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancing k-space quantitative susceptibility mapping by enforcing consistency on the cone data (CCD) with structural priors.
    Wen Y; Wang Y; Liu T
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Feb; 75(2):823-30. PubMed ID: 25752805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new discrete dipole kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Milovic C; Acosta-Cabronero J; Pinto JM; Mattern H; Andia M; Uribe S; Tejos C
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Sep; 51():7-13. PubMed ID: 29673893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preconditioned total field inversion (TFI) method for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Liu Z; Kee Y; Zhou D; Wang Y; Spincemaille P
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jul; 78(1):303-315. PubMed ID: 27464893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correction of magnetic field inhomogeneity effects for fast quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Ngo GC; Bilgic B; Gagoski BA; Sutton BP
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Mar; 81(3):1645-1658. PubMed ID: 30387905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Background field removal technique using regularization enabled sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data with varying kernel sizes.
    Kan H; Kasai H; Arai N; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 34(7):1026-33. PubMed ID: 27114339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF).
    Liu T; Khalidov I; de Rochefort L; Spincemaille P; Liu J; Tsiouris AJ; Wang Y
    NMR Biomed; 2011 Nov; 24(9):1129-36. PubMed ID: 21387445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gradient-Based Pulsed Excitation and Relaxation Encoding in Magnetic Particle Imaging.
    Jia G; Huang L; Wang Z; Liang X; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Miao Q; Hu K; Li T; Wang Y; Xi L; Feng X; Hui H; Tian J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2022 Dec; 41(12):3725-3733. PubMed ID: 35862339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid calculation of static magnetic field perturbation generated by magnetized objects in arbitrary orientations.
    Yeo SJ; Lee SH; Lee SK
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Feb; 87(2):1015-1027. PubMed ID: 34617634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phase processing for quantitative susceptibility mapping of regions with large susceptibility and lack of signal.
    Fortier V; Levesque IR
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jun; 79(6):3103-3113. PubMed ID: 29130526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Background field removal technique based on non-regularized variable kernels sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Kan H; Arai N; Takizawa M; Omori K; Kasai H; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():94-101. PubMed ID: 29902566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perturbation method for magnetic field calculations of nonconductive objects.
    Jenkinson M; Wilson JL; Jezzard P
    Magn Reson Med; 2004 Sep; 52(3):471-7. PubMed ID: 15334564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward online reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility maps: superfast dipole inversion.
    Schweser F; Deistung A; Sommer K; Reichenbach JR
    Magn Reson Med; 2013 Jun; 69(6):1582-94. PubMed ID: 22791625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid two-step dipole inversion for susceptibility mapping with sparsity priors.
    Kames C; Wiggermann V; Rauscher A
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():276-283. PubMed ID: 29138089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.