These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24109949)

  • 21. Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation.
    Ahlfors SP; Han J; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Sep; 23(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 20640882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Goldenholz DM; Ahlfors SP; Hämäläinen MS; Sharon D; Ishitobi M; Vaina LM; Stufflebeam SM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1077-86. PubMed ID: 18465745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources.
    Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Clerc M; Engwer C; Wolters CH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Mar; 42(4):978-992. PubMed ID: 33156569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporal dynamics of ipsilateral and contralateral motor activity during voluntary finger movement.
    Huang MX; Harrington DL; Paulson KM; Weisend MP; Lee RR
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 Sep; 23(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 15281139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. High resolution DC-EEG analysis of the Bereitschaftspotential and post movement onset potentials accompanying uni- or bilateral voluntary finger movements.
    Cui RQ; Deecke L
    Brain Topogr; 1999; 11(3):233-49. PubMed ID: 10217447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
    Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.
    Mosher JC; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Mar; 46(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 10097460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Magneto-encephalographic correlates of the lateralized readiness potential.
    Praamstra P; Schmitz F; Freund HJ; Schnitzler A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1999 Jul; 8(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 10407197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Precision of dipole localization in a spherical volume conductor: a comparison of referential EEG, magnetoencephalography and scalp current density methods.
    Murro AM; Smith JR; King DW; Park YD
    Brain Topogr; 1995; 8(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 8793122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
    Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sniffing-related motor cortical potential: topography and possible generators.
    Jeran J; Koritnik B; Zidar I; Belič A; Zidar J
    Respir Physiol Neurobiol; 2013 Jan; 185(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 23078972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Anatomically constrained minimum variance beamforming applied to EEG.
    Murzin V; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 214(4):515-28. PubMed ID: 21915671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Decoding performance for hand movements: EEG vs. MEG.
    Waldert S; Braun C; Preissl H; Birbaumer N; Aertsen A; Mehring C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():5346-8. PubMed ID: 18003215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. MEG and EEG in epilepsy.
    Barkley GL; Baumgartner C
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2003; 20(3):163-78. PubMed ID: 12881663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation.
    Molins A; Stufflebeam SM; Brown EN; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):1069-77. PubMed ID: 18602485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of EEG and MEG in source localization of induced human gamma-band oscillations during visual stimulus.
    Mideksa KG; Hoogenboom N; Hellriegel H; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():8119-22. PubMed ID: 26738178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information.
    Baillet S; Garnero L; Marin G; Hugonin JP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 May; 46(5):522-34. PubMed ID: 10230131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Linear estimation discriminates midline sources and a motor cortex contribution to the readiness potential.
    Knösche T; Praamstra P; Stegeman D; Peters M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Aug; 99(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 8761054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimum-norm cortical source estimation in layered head models is robust against skull conductivity error.
    Stenroos M; Hauk O
    Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():265-272. PubMed ID: 23639259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.