These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24110228)

  • 1. Defining gross tumor volume using positron emission tomography/computed tomography phantom studies.
    Jin GH; Choi GR; Park HH; Lee TS; Lee SB
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():2473-6. PubMed ID: 24110228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of dedicated breast positron emission tomography and whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography images: a common phantom study.
    Satoh Y; Motosugi U; Imai M; Onishi H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 34(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 31768819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography.
    Black QC; Grills IS; Kestin LL; Wong CY; Wong JW; Martinez AA; Yan D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1272-82. PubMed ID: 15519800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intra-tumour 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity decreases the reliability on target volume definition with positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.
    Dong X; Wu P; Sun X; Li W; Wan H; Yu J; Xing L
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jun; 59(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25708154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative assessment of methods for estimating tumor volume and standardized uptake value in (18)F-FDG PET.
    Tylski P; Stute S; Grotus N; Doyeux K; Hapdey S; Gardin I; Vanderlinden B; Buvat I
    J Nucl Med; 2010 Feb; 51(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 20080896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partial volume correction strategies for quantitative FDG PET in oncology.
    Hoetjes NJ; van Velden FH; Hoekstra OS; Hoekstra CJ; Krak NC; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Aug; 37(9):1679-87. PubMed ID: 20422184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures.
    Makris NE; Huisman MC; Kinahan PE; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Oct; 40(10):1507-15. PubMed ID: 23754762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of tumor volumes as determined by pathologic examination and FDG-PET/CT images of non-small-cell lung cancer: a pilot study.
    Yu J; Li X; Xing L; Mu D; Fu Z; Sun X; Sun X; Yang G; Zhang B; Sun X; Ling CC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Dec; 75(5):1468-74. PubMed ID: 19464822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delineation gross tumor volume based on positron emission tomography images by a numerical approximation method.
    Chen Y; Chen X; Li F; Ji-An L
    Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Dec; 28(10):980-5. PubMed ID: 25096024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical implications of different image reconstruction parameters for interpretation of whole-body PET studies in cancer patients.
    Schöder H; Erdi YE; Chao K; Gonen M; Larson SM; Yeung HW
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 15073250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.
    Williams JM; Rani SD; Li X; Arlinghaus LR; Lee TC; MacDonald LR; Partridge SC; Kang H; Whisenant JG; Abramson RG; Linden HM; Kinahan PE; Yankeelov TE
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3801-13. PubMed ID: 26133582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standardized uptake value-based evaluations of solitary pulmonary nodules using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography.
    Degirmenci B; Wilson D; Laymon CM; Becker C; Mason NS; Bencherif B; Agarwal A; Luketich J; Landreneau R; Avril N
    Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jul; 29(7):614-22. PubMed ID: 18528183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined correction of recovery effect and motion blur for SUV quantification of solitary pulmonary nodules in FDG PET/CT.
    Apostolova I; Wiemker R; Paulus T; Kabus S; Dreilich T; van den Hoff J; Plotkin M; Mester J; Brenner W; Buchert R; Klutmann S
    Eur Radiol; 2010 Aug; 20(8):1868-77. PubMed ID: 20306084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) physiologic imaging of choroidal melanoma: before and after ophthalmic plaque radiation therapy.
    Finger PT; Chin KJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Jan; 79(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 20395070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of PET standard uptake value and CT window-level thresholds for target delineation in CT-based radiation treatment planning.
    Hong R; Halama J; Bova D; Sethi A; Emami B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 17293230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of standardized uptake value-based positron emission tomography and computed tomography target volumes in esophageal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.
    Vali FS; Nagda S; Hall W; Sinacore J; Gao M; Lee SH; Hong R; Shoup M; Emami B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(4):1057-63. PubMed ID: 20199850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the standard uptake value (SUV) appropriate for quantification in clinical PET imaging? - Variability induced by different SUV measurements and varying reconstruction methods.
    Brendle C; Kupferschläger J; Nikolaou K; la Fougère C; Gatidis S; Pfannenberg C
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):158-162. PubMed ID: 25467224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FDG-PET/CT-based gross tumor volume contouring for radiation therapy planning: an experimental phantom study.
    Toya R; Murakami R; Tashiro K; Yoshida M; Sakamoto F; Kawanaka K; Shiraishi S; Nakaguchi Y; Tsujita N; Oya N; Tomiguchi S; Yamashita Y
    J Radiat Res; 2012; 53(2):338-41. PubMed ID: 22398846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Geometrical differences in target volumes based on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and four-dimensional computed tomography maximum intensity projection images of primary thoracic esophageal cancer.
    Guo Y; Li J; Wang W; Zhang Y; Wang J; Duan Y; Shang D; Fu Z
    Dis Esophagus; 2014; 27(8):744-50. PubMed ID: 24915760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correction of an image size difference between positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) improves image fusion of dedicated PET and CT.
    Vogel WV; van Dalen JA; Schinagl DA; Kaanders JH; Huisman H; Corstens FH; Oyen WJ
    Nucl Med Commun; 2006 Jun; 27(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 16710106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.