102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24110269)
1. Global optimization of optimal angiographic viewing angles for coronary arteries with multiple segments.
Wang X; Yang J; Yang T; Wang Y
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():2640-3. PubMed ID: 24110269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new algorithm for calculating optimal viewing angles in coronary angiography based on 4-D cardiac computed tomography.
Chen X; Li J; Zhang Z; Wang Y; Jia Z; Pu K; Yu D
J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24699343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views.
Green NE; Chen SY; Hansgen AR; Messenger JC; Groves BM; Carroll JD
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Apr; 64(4):451-9. PubMed ID: 15744720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3-D reconstruction of coronary arterial tree to optimize angiographic visualization.
Chen SJ; Carroll JD
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Apr; 19(4):318-36. PubMed ID: 10909927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: clinical validation and quantitative analysis of the right coronary artery in 100 patients.
Messenger JC; Chen SY; Carroll JD; Burchenal JE; Kioussopoulos K; Groves BM
Int J Card Imaging; 2000 Dec; 16(6):413-27. PubMed ID: 11482706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative Analysis of Deformable Model-Based 3-D Reconstruction of Coronary Artery From Multiple Angiograms.
Cong W; Yang J; Ai D; Chen Y; Liu Y; Wang Y
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Aug; 62(8):2079-90. PubMed ID: 25807562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel approach for 3-d reconstruction of coronary arteries from two uncalibrated angiographic images.
Yang J; Wang Y; Liu Y; Tang S; Chen W
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Jul; 18(7):1563-72. PubMed ID: 19414289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of angiographic late loss with neointimal proliferation in stents evaluated by OCT and histology in porcine coronary arteries.
Kim JS; Wallace-Bradley D; Alviar CL; Conditt G; Milewski K; Afari ME; Cheng Y; Gallego C; Tellez A; Stone GW; Kaluza GL; Granada JF
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep; 4(9):1002-10. PubMed ID: 21920339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of coronary artery stenosis by coronary angiography: a head-to-head comparison with pathological coronary artery anatomy.
Jiangping S; Zhe Z; Wei W; Yunhu S; Jie H; Hongyue W; Hong Z; Shengshou H
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 23696600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coronary MR angiography with steady-state free precession: individually adapted breath-hold technique versus free-breathing technique.
Jahnke C; Paetsch I; Schnackenburg B; Bornstedt A; Gebker R; Fleck E; Nagel E
Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):669-76. PubMed ID: 15284430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Viewpoint planning for quantitative coronary angiography.
Preuhs A; Berger M; Bauer S; Redel T; Unberath M; Achenbach S; Maier A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Aug; 13(8):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 29858733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Optimization of coronary angiographic views. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of a new system].
Finet G; Liénard J; Masquet C; Eifferman A; Funck F; Lefèvre T; Marco J; Amiel M; Beaune J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1996 Dec; 89(12):1617-25. PubMed ID: 9137727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A viewpoint determination system for stenosis diagnosis and quantification in coronary angiographic image acquisition.
Sato Y; Araki T; Hanayama M; Naito H; Tamura S
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Feb; 17(1):121-37. PubMed ID: 9617913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of optimal angiographic viewing angles: basic principles and evaluation study.
Dumay AM; Reiber JC; Gerbrands JJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1994; 13(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 18218480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation by high-frequency epicardial echocardiography of a new method of analyzing coronary angiography quantitatively in coronary artery disease.
McPherson DD; Johnson MR; Collins SM; Kieso RA; Marcus ML; Kerber RE
Am J Cardiol; 1993 Jan; 71(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8420232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Luminal eccentricity and deformity in atherosclerotic coronary arteries.
Laurence L; Thurman R; John H; Bruce TC
Paroi Arterielle; 1976 Oct; 3(4):167-73. PubMed ID: 1012743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy assessment of layer decomposition using simulated angiographic image sequences.
Close RA; Abbey CK; Morioka CA; Whiting JS
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Oct; 20(10):990-8. PubMed ID: 11686445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography with 3D TrueFISP: breath-hold versus respiratory gated imaging.
So NM; Lam WW; Li D; Chan AK; Sanderson JE; Metreweli C
Br J Radiol; 2005 Feb; 78(926):116-21. PubMed ID: 15681322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of an accurate method for three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative assessment of volumes, lengths and diameters of coronary vascular branches and segments from biplane angiographic projections.
Wellnhofer E; Wahle A; Mugaragu I; Gross J; Oswald H; Fleck E
Int J Card Imaging; 1999 Oct; 15(5):339-53; discussion 355-6. PubMed ID: 10595401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography with intracoronary ultrasound. Can quantitative coronary angiography accurately estimate the severity of a luminal stenosis?
Bourantas CV; Tweddel AC; Papafaklis MI; Karvelis PS; Fotiadis DI; Katsouras CS; Michalis LK
Angiology; 2009; 60(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 18508852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
