121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24110497)
1. Auditory mismatch negativity in cochlear implant users: a window to spectral discrimination.
Lopez-Valdes A; Mc Laughlin M; Viani L; Walshe P; Smith J; Zeng FG; Reilly RB
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3555-8. PubMed ID: 24110497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mismatch negativity (MMN) objectively reflects timbre discrimination thresholds in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Rahne T; Plontke SK; Wagner L
Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 1586():143-51. PubMed ID: 25152464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
Prévost F; Lehmann A
Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between auditory perception skills and mismatch negativity recorded in free field in cochlear-implant users.
Roman S; Canévet G; Marquis P; Triglia JM; Liégeois-Chauvel C
Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):10-20. PubMed ID: 15721556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cortical encoding of timbre changes in cochlear implant users.
Zhang F; Benson C; Cahn SJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 23231816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An objective auditory measure to assess speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users.
Turgeon C; Lazzouni L; Lepore F; Ellemberg D
Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Apr; 125(4):827-835. PubMed ID: 24209981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spectral and temporal measures in hybrid cochlear implant users: on the mechanism of electroacoustic hearing benefits.
Golub JS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Worman TD; Rubinstein JT
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Feb; 33(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 22215451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Middle Latency Responses to Optimized Chirps in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Alemi R; Lehmann A
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):396-405. PubMed ID: 31044692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The MMN as a viable and objective marker of auditory development in CI users.
Näätänen R; Petersen B; Torppa R; Lonka E; Vuust P
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():57-75. PubMed ID: 28800468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. From hearing with a cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid (CI/HA) to hearing with two cochlear implants (CI/CI): a within-subject design comparison.
Luntz M; Egra-Dagan D; Attias J; Yehudai N; Most T; Shpak T
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1682-90. PubMed ID: 25275862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mismatch negativity brain response as an index of speech perception recovery in cochlear-implant recipients.
Lonka E; Kujala T; Lehtokoski A; Johansson R; Rimmanen S; Alho K; Näätänen R
Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(3):160-2. PubMed ID: 15084820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term auditory processing outcomes in early implanted young adults with cochlear implants: The mismatch negativity vs. P300 response.
Abrahamse R; Beynon A; Piai V
Clin Neurophysiol; 2021 Jan; 132(1):258-268. PubMed ID: 33139199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
Jung KH; Won JH; Drennan WR; Jameyson E; Miyasaki G; Norton SJ; Rubinstein JT
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 22398954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mismatch negativity: a tool for the assessment of stimuli discrimination in cochlear implant subjects.
Wable J; van den Abbeele T; Gallégo S; Frachet B
Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 111(4):743-51. PubMed ID: 10727926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear-implant users.
Kraus N; Micco AG; Koch DB; McGee T; Carrell T; Sharma A; Wiet RJ; Weingarten CZ
Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):118-24. PubMed ID: 8458744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Timbre discrimination in cochlear implant users and normal hearing subjects using cross-faded synthetic tones.
Rahne T; Böhme L; Götze G
J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Aug; 199(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 21664377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
