BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24110497)

  • 21. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A neural-based vocoder implementation for evaluating cochlear implant coding strategies.
    El Boghdady N; Kegel A; Lai WK; Dillier N
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():136-149. PubMed ID: 26775182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Patient-Reported Outcomes From the United States Clinical Trial for a Hybrid Cochlear Implant.
    Kelsall DC; Arnold RJG; Lionnet L
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):1251-1261. PubMed ID: 28777227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The mismatch negativity in cochlear implant users.
    Ponton CW; Don M
    Ear Hear; 1995 Feb; 16(1):131-46. PubMed ID: 7774766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perception of suprasegmental speech features via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant on one ear and hearing aid on the other.
    Most T; Harel T; Shpak T; Luntz M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Apr; 54(2):668-78. PubMed ID: 20844254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Oates PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):399-415. PubMed ID: 12411773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of residual hearing prior to cochlear implantation on speech perception in children.
    Gordon KA; Twitchell KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    J Otolaryngol; 2001 Aug; 30(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 11771033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Effect of Aging and the High-Frequency Auditory Threshold on Speech-Evoked Mismatch Negativity in a Noisy Background.
    Chen J; Chen S; Zheng Y; Ou Y
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26650255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech evoked potentials: from the laboratory to the clinic.
    Martin BA; Tremblay KL; Korczak P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):285-313. PubMed ID: 18453883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.
    Drennan WR; Won JH; Timme AO; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 26656317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Objective assessment of spectral ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners using cortical evoked responses to an oddball paradigm.
    Lopez Valdes A; Mc Laughlin M; Viani L; Walshe P; Smith J; Zeng FG; Reilly RB
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e90044. PubMed ID: 24599314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of intonation contours for speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Pyschny V; Grugel L; Walger M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):EL204-9. PubMed ID: 21568376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of electrophysiological and behavioural measures of electrode discrimination in adult cochlear implant users.
    Mathew R; Vickers D; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Undurraga J
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():74-87. PubMed ID: 30031354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.
    Horn DL; Dudley DJ; Dedhia K; Nie K; Drennan WR; Won JH; Rubinstein JT; Werner LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):613. PubMed ID: 28147578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users.
    Mathew R; Undurraga J; Li G; Meerton L; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Vickers D
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():86-101. PubMed ID: 28826636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.