121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24110497)
41. [Auditory localization and speech perception in noise. Preliminary study concerning 5 cases of perceptual deafness].
Canévet G; Santon F; Scharf B
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1986; 103(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3706968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing.
Davies-Venn E; Nelson P; Souza P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):492-503. PubMed ID: 26233047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The Relationship Between Environmental Sound Awareness and Speech Recognition Skills in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users.
Harris MS; Boyce L; Pisoni DB; Shafiro V; Moberly AC
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):e308-e314. PubMed ID: 28731964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Validation of a clinical assessment of spectral-ripple resolution for cochlear implant users.
Drennan WR; Anderson ES; Won JH; Rubinstein JT
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e92-8. PubMed ID: 24552679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Learning in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
Miller S; Zhang Y; Nelson P
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):514-28. PubMed ID: 26928002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Relationship between behavioral and physiological spectral-ripple discrimination.
Won JH; Clinard CG; Kwon S; Dasika VK; Nie K; Drennan WR; Tremblay KL; Rubinstein JT
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 12(3):375-93. PubMed ID: 21271274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Cochlear implant users' spectral ripple resolution.
Jeon EK; Turner CW; Karsten SA; Henry BA; Gantz BJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):2350-8. PubMed ID: 26520316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Event-related potentials for better speech perception in noise by cochlear implant users.
Soshi T; Hisanaga S; Kodama N; Kanekama Y; Samejima Y; Yumoto E; Sekiyama K
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():110-21. PubMed ID: 25158303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Programming peculiarities in two cochlear implant users with superficial siderosis of the central nervous system.
Bittencourt AG; Goffi-Gomez MV; Pinna MH; Bento RF; de Brito R; Tsuji RK
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 269(5):1555-63. PubMed ID: 22278194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.
Lawler M; Yu J; Aronoff JM
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):760-766. PubMed ID: 28957975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Cochlear implantation in children with cochlear nerve deficiency.
Vincenti V; Ormitti F; Ventura E; Guida M; Piccinini A; Pasanisi E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jun; 78(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 24690223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Acoustic Cue Weighting by Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Mismatch Negativity Study.
Moberly AC; Bhat J; Shahin AJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 26655914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Improved interaural timing of acoustic nerve stimulation affects sound localization in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Seebacher J; Franke-Trieger A; Weichbold V; Zorowka P; Stephan K
Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():19-27. PubMed ID: 30439571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison between bilateral cochlear implants and Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP Binaural cochlear implant: speech perception, sound localization and patient self-assessment.
Bonnard D; Lautissier S; Bosset-Audoit A; Coriat G; Beraha M; Maunoury A; Martel J; Darrouzet V; Bébéar JP; Dauman R
Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 23548561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A comparison of speech discrimination with cochlear implants and tactile aids.
Carney AE; Osberger MJ; Carney E; Robbins AM; Renshaw J; Miyamoto RT
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2036-49. PubMed ID: 8227746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Validation of the Egyptian Arabic Assessment of Auditory Skills development using children with Cochlear Implants.
El-Dessouky HM; Aziz AA; Sheikhany AR; ElMeshmeshy LM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jul; 122():52-59. PubMed ID: 30974335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.
Henry BA; Turner CW; Behrens A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1111-21. PubMed ID: 16158665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
