These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24110497)

  • 61. Systematic review of compound action potentials as predictors for cochlear implant performance.
    van Eijl RH; Buitenhuis PJ; Stegeman I; Klis SF; Grolman W
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Feb; 127(2):476-487. PubMed ID: 27804133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users.
    Won JH; Moon IJ; Jin S; Park H; Woo J; Cho YS; Chung WH; Hong SH
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140920. PubMed ID: 26485715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Refractory effects of the N1 event-related potential in experienced cochlear implant patients.
    Cowper-Smith CD; Green J; Maessen H; Bance M; Newman AJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 23282338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Adult Cochlear Implant Users Are Able to Discriminate Basic Tonal Features in Musical Patterns: Evidence From Event-related Potentials.
    Hahne A; Mainka A; Leuner A; Mürbe D
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e360-8. PubMed ID: 27631660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination.
    Kraus N; McGee T; Carrell TD; Sharma A
    Ear Hear; 1995 Feb; 16(1):19-37. PubMed ID: 7774767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A psychoacoustic application for the adjustment of electrical hearing thresholds in cochlear implant patients.
    Plesch J; Ernst BP; Strieth S; Rader T
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223625. PubMed ID: 31603927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Speech perception and cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant users with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders.
    Alvarenga KF; Amorim RB; Agostinho-Pesse RS; Costa OA; Nascimento LT; Bevilacqua MC
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1332-8. PubMed ID: 22796193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Cortical Processing of Frequency Changes Reflected by the Acoustic Change Complex in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Liang C; Houston LM; Samy RN; Abedelrehim LMI; Zhang F
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(3):152-164. PubMed ID: 30300882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels.
    Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Nov; 120(5 Pt 1):2908-25. PubMed ID: 17139748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Assessment of basal sound identification skills and communication abilities in profoundly deaf children fitted with hearing aids or a cochlear implant.
    van den Borne S; Snik AF; Hoekstra CC; Vermeulen AM; van den Broek P; Brokx JP
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1998 Oct; 23(5):455-61. PubMed ID: 9800083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Speech recognition in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss.
    de Andrade AN; Iorio MC; Gil D
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016; 82(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 26614048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds improves spectral ripple and speech reception thresholds in cochlear implant users.
    Zhou N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL243. PubMed ID: 28372106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Individual differences in auditory discrimination of spectral shape and speech-identification performance among elderly listeners.
    Shrivastav MN; Humes LE; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Feb; 119(2):1131-42. PubMed ID: 16521774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Enhanced audio-visual interactions in the auditory cortex of elderly cochlear-implant users.
    Schierholz I; Finke M; Schulte S; Hauthal N; Kantzke C; Rach S; Büchner A; Dengler R; Sandmann P
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():133-47. PubMed ID: 26302946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Frequency change detection and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Zhang F; Underwood G; McGuire K; Liang C; Moore DR; Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 379():12-20. PubMed ID: 31035223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Auditory Discrimination of Lexical Stress Patterns in Hearing-Impaired Infants with Cochlear Implants Compared with Normal Hearing: Influence of Acoustic Cues and Listening Experience to the Ambient Language.
    Segal O; Houston D; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 26627470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.