146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24110658)
1. Effect of temporal fine structure on speech intelligibility modeling.
Chen F; Guan T; Wong LL
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():4199-202. PubMed ID: 24110658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.
Chen F; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21206363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory inspired machine learning techniques can improve speech intelligibility and quality for hearing-impaired listeners.
Monaghan JJ; Goehring T; Yang X; Bolner F; Wang S; Wright MC; Bleeck S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1985. PubMed ID: 28372043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of compression speed on intelligibility: simulated hearing-aid processing with and without original temporal fine structure information.
Hopkins K; King A; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1592-601. PubMed ID: 22978888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded and wideband Mandarin Chinese.
Chen F; Loizou PC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3281-90. PubMed ID: 21568429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Xia J; Xu B; Pentony S; Xu J; Swaminathan J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1523. PubMed ID: 29604671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of noise suppression and envelope dynamic range compression on the intelligibility of vocoded sentences for a tonal language.
Chen F; Zheng D; Tsao Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):1157. PubMed ID: 28964090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise.
Krueger M; Schulte M; Zokoll MA; Wagener KC; Meis M; Brand T; Holube I
Am J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 26(3S):378-392. PubMed ID: 29049622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling the Intelligibility Benefit of Active Noise Cancelation in Hearing Devices That Improve Signal-to-Noise Ratio.
Sabin AT; McElhone D; Gauger D; Rabinowitz B
Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241260029. PubMed ID: 38831646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of single-microphone noise reduction schemes: can hearing impaired listeners tell the difference?
Huber R; Bisitz T; Gerkmann T; Kiessling J; Meister H; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S55-S61. PubMed ID: 28112001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
