These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24110700)

  • 1. Nonlinear estimation of coupling and directionality between signals: application to uterine EMG propagation.
    Diab A; Hassan M; Boudaoud S; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():4366-9. PubMed ID: 24110700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial analysis of uterine EMG signals: evidence of increased in synchronization with term.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Karlsson B; Marque C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6296-9. PubMed ID: 19963919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonlinearity testing in the case of non Gaussian surrogates, applied to improving analysis of synchronicity in uterine contraction.
    Terrien J; Hassan M; Germain G; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3477-80. PubMed ID: 19964990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance comparison of coupling-evaluation methods in discriminating between pregnancy and labor EHG signals.
    Diab A; Boudaoud S; Karlsson B; Marque C
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 May; 132():104308. PubMed ID: 33711558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance analysis of four nonlinearity analysis methods using a model with variable complexity and application to uterine EMG signals.
    Diab A; Hassan M; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):761-7. PubMed ID: 24593872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A nonlinear parameterization of multivariate electrohysterographical signals.
    Radomski DS
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():13-20. PubMed ID: 26484592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative performance analysis of four methods of evaluating signal nonlinearity: application to uterine EMG signals.
    Diab A; Hassan M; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():1045-8. PubMed ID: 23366074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Better pregnancy monitoring using nonlinear correlation analysis of external uterine electromyography.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Muszynski C; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Apr; 60(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 23192483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between approximate entropy, correntropy and time reversibility: application to uterine electromyogram signals.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):980-6. PubMed ID: 21497127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The linear synchronization measures of uterine EMG signals: Evidence of synchronized action potentials during propagation.
    Domino M; Pawlinski B; Gajewski Z
    Theriogenology; 2016 Nov; 86(8):1873-8. PubMed ID: 27570104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reprint of 'A nonlinear parameterization of multivariate electrohysterographical signals'.
    Radomski DS
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Feb; 69():254-60. PubMed ID: 26832964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synchronization in the bivariate intrauterine pressure signals' nonlinear dynamics methods.
    Oczeretko E; Borowska M; Kitlas A; Laudanski P; Laudanski T
    Reprod Sci; 2010 Jul; 17(7):667-72. PubMed ID: 20404355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of filtering on the classification rate of nonlinear analysis methods applied to uterine EMG signals.
    Diab A; Falou O; Hassan M; Karlsson B; Marque C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():4182-5. PubMed ID: 26737216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the propagation analysis of electrohysterographic signals.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar J; Oei G; Bergmans J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3868-71. PubMed ID: 19163557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-correlation analysis of multichannel uterine EMG signals.
    Halabi R; Diab MO; Moslem B; Khalil M; Marque C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():3106-9. PubMed ID: 23366582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multifractal Analysis of Uterine Electromyography Signals for the Assessment of Progression of Pregnancy in Term Conditions.
    Namadurai P; Padmanabhan V; Swaminathan R
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2019 Sep; 23(5):1972-1979. PubMed ID: 30369459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of Electrohysterographic Signal Propagation Direction during Uterine Contraction: the Application of Directed Information.
    Xu Y; Hao D; Zheng D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():21-25. PubMed ID: 33017921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Classification performance of the frequency-related parameters derived from uterine EMG signals.
    Moslem B; Karlsson B; Diab MO; Khalil M; Marque C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():3371-4. PubMed ID: 22255062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Velocity and directionality of the electrohysterographic signal propagation.
    Lange L; Vaeggemose A; Kidmose P; Mikkelsen E; Uldbjerg N; Johansen P
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86775. PubMed ID: 24466235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acquisition and Analysis of Electrohysterogram Signal.
    R P; S SD
    J Med Syst; 2020 Feb; 44(3):66. PubMed ID: 32040634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.