These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24110711)

  • 1. Quantitative performance assessments for neuromagnetic imaging systems.
    Koga R; Hiyama E; Matsumoto T; Sekihara K
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():4410-3. PubMed ID: 24110711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fusion of magnetometer and gradiometer sensors of MEG in the presence of multiplicative error.
    Mohseni HR; Woolrich MW; Kringelbach ML; Luckhoo H; Smith PP; Aziz TZ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Jul; 59(7):1951-61. PubMed ID: 22531739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigation of EEG and MEG source imaging accuracy in reconstructing extended cortical sources.
    Ding L; Yuan H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7013-6. PubMed ID: 22255953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of sensor calibration, balancing and parametrization on the signal space separation method.
    Nurminen J; Taulu S; Okada Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1975-87. PubMed ID: 18354243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of brain function in pre-school children using a custom sized whole-head MEG sensor array.
    Johnson BW; Crain S; Thornton R; Tesan G; Reid M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Mar; 121(3):340-9. PubMed ID: 19955015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new wavelet transform to sparsely represent cortical current densities for EEG/MEG inverse problems.
    Liao K; Zhu M; Ding L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 23706527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controlled Support MEG imaging.
    Nagarajan SS; Portniaguine O; Hwang D; Johnson C; Sekihara K
    Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(3):878-85. PubMed ID: 16978882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating functional connectivity using 2D tangential components in MEG sensor space.
    Kim MY; Kwon H; Lim S; Lee YH; Kim JW; Kim K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jan; 257():64-75. PubMed ID: 26393280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating scalp MEG from whole-head MEG measurements.
    Wang Y; Oertel U
    Brain Topogr; 2000; 12(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 10791684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Virtual MEG Helmet: Computer Simulation of an Approach to Neuromagnetic Field Sampling.
    Medvedovsky M; Nenonen J; Koptelova A; Butorina A; Paetau R; Mäkelä JP; Ahonen A; Simola J; Gazit T; Taulu S
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2016 Mar; 20(2):539-48. PubMed ID: 25616085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian inverse analysis of neuromagnetic data using cortically constrained multiple dipoles.
    Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Vehtari A; Sams M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Oct; 28(10):979-94. PubMed ID: 17370346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the Potential of a New Generation of Magnetometers for MEG: A Beamformer Simulation Study.
    Boto E; Bowtell R; Krüger P; Fromhold TM; Morris PG; Meyer SS; Barnes GR; Brookes MJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0157655. PubMed ID: 27564416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving MEG performance with additional tangential sensors.
    Nurminen J; Taulu S; Nenonen J; Helle L; Simola J; Ahonen A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Sep; 60(9):2559-66. PubMed ID: 23649129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new method for magnetoencephalography: a three-dimensional magnetometer-spatial filter system.
    Toyama K; Yoshikawa K; Yoshida Y; Kondo Y; Tomita S; Takanashi Y; Ejima Y; Yoshizawa S
    Neuroscience; 1999; 91(2):405-15. PubMed ID: 10365998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting neuromagnetic synchrony in the presence of noise.
    Wianda E; Ross B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Mar; 262():41-55. PubMed ID: 26777472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: methods and validation.
    Darvas F; Pantazis D; Kucukaltun-Yildirim E; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2004; 23 Suppl 1():S289-99. PubMed ID: 15501098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EEG/MEG source imaging using fMRI informed time-variant constraints.
    Xu J; Sheng J; Qian T; Luo YJ; Gao JH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1700-1711. PubMed ID: 29293277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mapping function in the human brain with magnetoencephalography, anatomical magnetic resonance imaging, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    George JS; Aine CJ; Mosher JC; Schmidt DM; Ranken DM; Schlitt HA; Wood CC; Lewine JD; Sanders JA; Belliveau JW
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Sep; 12(5):406-31. PubMed ID: 8576388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.