These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Effects of Alpha-Blockade on Ureteral Peristalsis and Intrapelvic Pressure in an In Vivo Stented Porcine Model. Johnson LJ; Davenport D; Venkatesh R J Endourol; 2016 Apr; 30(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 26650710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The 'buoy' stent: evaluation of a prototype indwelling ureteric stent in a porcine model. Krebs A; Deane LA; Borin JF; Edwards RA; Sala LG; Khan F; Abdelshehid C; McDougall EM; Clayman RV BJU Int; 2009 Jul; 104(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 19154469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Analysis of Urine Flow in Three Different Ureter Models. Kim KW; Choi YH; Lee SB; Baba Y; Kim HH; Suh SH Comput Math Methods Med; 2017; 2017():5172641. PubMed ID: 28659992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Numerical analysis of the urine flow in a stented ureter with no peristalsis. Kim HH; Choi YH; Lee SB; Baba Y; Kim KW; Suh SH Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S215-23. PubMed ID: 26405994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Microfluidic-Based Investigation of Bacterial Attachment in Ureteral Stents. De Grazia A; LuTheryn G; Meghdadi A; Mosayyebi A; Espinosa-Ortiz EJ; Gerlach R; Carugo D Micromachines (Basel); 2020 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 32295085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Indwelling stents cause obstruction and induce ureteral injury and fibrosis in a porcine model. Scotland KB; Almutairi K; Park E; Wang L; Kung SHY; Haegert A; Adomat H; Bell R; LeBihan S; Chew BH; Lange D BJU Int; 2023 Mar; 131(3):367-375. PubMed ID: 36181708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impact on ureteral peristalsis in a stented ureter. An experimental study in the pig. Kinn AC; Lykkeskov-Andersen H Urol Res; 2002 Sep; 30(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 12202937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Next generation biodegradable ureteral stent in a yucatan pig model. Chew BH; Lange D; Paterson RF; Hendlin K; Monga M; Clinkscales KW; Shalaby SW; Hadaschik BA J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):765-71. PubMed ID: 20022028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A three-dimensional (3D) two-way coupled fluid-structure interaction (FSI) study of peristaltic flow in obstructed ureters. Takaddus AT; Chandy AJ Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2018 Oct; 34(10):e3122. PubMed ID: 29939493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of a new polytetrafluoroethylene-covered metallic stent to a noncovered stent in canine ureters. Chung HH; Lee SH; Cho SB; Park HS; Kim YS; Kang BC; Frisoli JK; Razavi MK Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(3):619-28. PubMed ID: 18214599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A short biodegradable helical spiral ureteric stent provides better antireflux and drainage properties than a double-J stent. Lumiaho J; Heino A; Aaltomaa S; Välimaa T; Talja M Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 21222571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Drainage of infected kidneys with ureteral stents: does size matter? Modai J; Shilo Y; Leibovici D; Dror I; Kalchenko V; Berkowitz B World J Urol; 2022 Aug; 40(8):2041-2046. PubMed ID: 35731266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computational fluid dynamics with stents: quantitative comparison with particle image velocimetry for three commercial off the shelf intracranial stents. Bouillot P; Brina O; Ouared R; Yilmaz H; Lovblad KO; Farhat M; Mendes Pereira V J Neurointerv Surg; 2016 Mar; 8(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 25603807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The morphological, in situ effects of a self-reinforced bioabsorbable polylactide (SR-PLA 96) ureteric stent; an experimental study. Lumiaho J; Heino A; Pietiläinen T; Ala-Opas M; Talja M; Välimaa T; Törmälä P J Urol; 2000 Oct; 164(4):1360-3. PubMed ID: 10992415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vitro encrustation of a semi-permanent polymer-covered nitinol ureter stent: an artificial urine model. Shaheen T; Edirisinghe T; Gabriel M; Bourdoumis A; Buchholz N; Knight M Urolithiasis; 2014 Jun; 42(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 24639093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of balloon-expandable coronary stents: influence of stent and vessel deformation. Martin DM; Murphy EA; Boyle FJ Med Eng Phys; 2014 Aug; 36(8):1047-56. PubMed ID: 24953569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A two-dimensional numerical study of peristaltic contractions in obstructed ureter flows. Najafi Z; Schwartz BF; Chandy AJ; Mahajan AM Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Jan; 21(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 29271257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]