109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24111214)
1. Evaluation of anomaly detection algorithm using trans-admittance mammography with 60 × 60 electrode array.
Zhao M; Wi H; Oh TI; Woo EJ
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():6433-6. PubMed ID: 24111214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of anomaly detection and characterization using trans-admittance mammography with 60 × 60 electrode array.
Zhao M; Wi H; Lee EJ; Woo EJ; Oh TI
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 59(19):5831-47. PubMed ID: 25207623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Regional admittivity spectra with tomosynthesis images for breast cancer detection.
Kao TJ; Boverman G; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC; Moore RH; Kopans DB
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4142-5. PubMed ID: 18002914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A reconstruction algorithm for breast cancer imaging with electrical impedance tomography in mammography geometry.
Choi MH; Kao TJ; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 54(4):700-10. PubMed ID: 17405377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast cancer detection using high-density flexible electrode arrays and electrical impedance tomography.
Campisi MS; Barbre C; Chola A; Cunningham G; Woods V; Viventi J
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():1131-4. PubMed ID: 25570162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An image reconstruction algorithm for 3-D electrical impedance mammography.
Zhang X; Wang W; Sze G; Barber D; Chatwin C
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Dec; 33(12):2223-41. PubMed ID: 25014954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of breast cancer lesion detection using a multi-frequency trans-admittance scanner (TAS) with 10 Hz to 500 kHz bandwidth.
Oh TI; Lee J; Seo JK; Kim SW; Woo EJ
Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S71-84. PubMed ID: 17664649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of breast cancer risk using a machine learning approach embedded with a locality preserving projection algorithm.
Heidari M; Khuzani AZ; Hollingsworth AB; Danala G; Mirniaharikandehei S; Qiu Y; Liu H; Zheng B
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035020. PubMed ID: 29239858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pectoral muscle attenuation as a marker for breast cancer risk in full-field digital mammography.
Cheddad A; Czene K; Hall P; Humphreys K
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Jun; 24(6):985-91. PubMed ID: 25870223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of structural similarity in mammograms for detection of bilateral asymmetry.
Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Rangayyan RM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2015 Feb; 34(2):662-71. PubMed ID: 25361502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A compensated radiolucent electrode array for combined EIT and mammography.
Kao TJ; Saulnier GJ; Xia H; Tamma C; Newell JC; Isaacson D
Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S291-9. PubMed ID: 17664644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital versus screen-film mammography: impact of mammographic density and hormone therapy on breast cancer detection.
Chiarelli AM; Prummel MV; Muradali D; Shumak RS; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Done SJ; Yaffe MJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Nov; 154(2):377-87. PubMed ID: 26518019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative analysis for breast density estimation in low dose chest CT scans.
Moon WK; Lo CM; Goo JM; Bae MS; Chang JM; Huang CS; Chen JH; Ivanova V; Chang RF
J Med Syst; 2014 Mar; 38(3):21. PubMed ID: 24643751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography in Dense and Nondense Breasts.
Rafferty EA; Durand MA; Conant EF; Copit DS; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Miller DP
JAMA; 2016 Apr; 315(16):1784-6. PubMed ID: 27115381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography in the detection of breast cancer: rays of light through DMIST or more fog?
Tice JA; Feldman MD
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jan; 107(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 17377840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk factors and tumor characteristics of interval cancers by mammographic density.
Holm J; Humphreys K; Li J; Ploner A; Cheddad A; Eriksson M; Törnberg S; Hall P; Czene K
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(9):1030-7. PubMed ID: 25646195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast Density Analysis Using an Automatic Density Segmentation Algorithm.
Oliver A; Tortajada M; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Ganau S; Tortajada L; Vilagran M; Sentís M; Martí R
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 25720749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An electrical impedance spectroscopy system for breast cancer detection.
Saulnier GJ; Liu N; Tamma C; Xia H; Kao TJ; Newell JC; Isaacson D
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4154-7. PubMed ID: 18002917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High density trans-admittance mammography development and preliminary phantom tests.
Zhao M; Wi H; Mostofa Kamal AH; McEwan AL; Woo EJ; Oh TI
Biomed Eng Online; 2012 Sep; 11():75. PubMed ID: 23009288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
