193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24111463)
1. Characterization of EHG contractions at term labor by nonlinear analysis.
Garcia-Gonzalez MT; Charleston-Villalobos S; Vargas-Garcia C; Gonzalez-Camarena R; Aljama-Corrales T
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7432-5. PubMed ID: 24111463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated electrohysterographic detection of uterine contractions for monitoring of pregnancy: feasibility and prospects.
Muszynski C; Happillon T; Azudin K; Tylcz JB; Istrate D; Marque C
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):136. PubMed ID: 29739438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of EHG Contractions at Pregnancy and Term Labor by Multiscale Entropy Analysis.
Garcia-Gonzalez MT; Charleston-Villalobos S; Gonzalez-Camarena R; Garcia-Ruiz AC; Aljama-Corrales T
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5987-5990. PubMed ID: 31947211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrohysterography during pregnancy: preliminary report.
Gondry J; Marque C; Duchene J; Cabrol D
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993; 27(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8369867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acquisition and Analysis of Electrohysterogram Signal.
R P; S SD
J Med Syst; 2020 Feb; 44(3):66. PubMed ID: 32040634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance comparison of coupling-evaluation methods in discriminating between pregnancy and labor EHG signals.
Diab A; Boudaoud S; Karlsson B; Marque C
Comput Biol Med; 2021 May; 132():104308. PubMed ID: 33711558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of electrohysterogram characteristics during uterine contraction and non-contraction during labor.
Zhihui Liu ; Dongmei Hao ; Lei Zhang ; Juntao Liu ; Xiya Zhou ; Lin Yang ; Yimin Yang ; Xuwen Li ; Song Zhang ; Dingchang Zheng
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():2924-2927. PubMed ID: 29060510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of labor using non-invasive Laplacian EHG recordings.
Ye-Lin Y; Prats-Boluda G; Alberola-Rubio J; Bueno Barrachina JM; Perales A; Garcia-Casado J
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7428-31. PubMed ID: 24111462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.
Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; McGorray SP; Euliano N; Onkala A; Gregg AR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 208(1):66.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23122926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonlinearity of EHG signals used to distinguish active labor from normal pregnancy contractions.
Hassan M; Terrien J; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2387-90. PubMed ID: 21096805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multi-channel electrohysterography enabled uterine contraction characterization and its effect in delivery assessment.
Shen J; Liu Y; Zhang M; Pumir A; Mu L; Li B; Xu J
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Dec; 167():107697. PubMed ID: 37976821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound analysis of the uterine wall movement for improved electrohysterographic measurement and modeling.
Rabotti C; de Lau H; Haazen N; Oei G; Mischi M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7436-9. PubMed ID: 24111464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of Electrohysterogram Recording System for Monitoring Uterine Contraction.
Hao D; An Y; Qiao X; Qiu Q; Zhou X; Peng J
J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():4230157. PubMed ID: 31354930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization and automatic classification of preterm and term uterine records.
Jager F; Libenšek S; Geršak K
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202125. PubMed ID: 30153264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic identification of motion artifacts in EHG recording for robust analysis of uterine contractions.
Ye-Lin Y; Garcia-Casado J; Prats-Boluda G; Alberola-Rubio J; Perales A
Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():470786. PubMed ID: 24523828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the propagation analysis of electrohysterographic signals.
Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar J; Oei G; Bergmans J
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3868-71. PubMed ID: 19163557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrohysterographic conduction velocity estimation.
Mischi M; Rabotti C; Vosters LJ; Oei SG; Bergmans JM
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6934-7. PubMed ID: 19964460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dedicated Entropy Measures for Early Assessment of Pregnancy Progression From Single-Channel Electrohysterography.
Mischi M; Chen C; Ignatenko T; de Lau H; Ding B; Oei SGG; Rabotti C
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Apr; 65(4):875-884. PubMed ID: 28692959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uterine slow wave: directionality and changes with imminent delivery.
Albaladejo-Belmonte M; Prats-Boluda G; Ye-Lin Y; Garfield RE; Garcia-Casado J
Physiol Meas; 2022 Aug; 43(8):. PubMed ID: 35896091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Uterine electromyogram database and processing function interface: An open standard analysis platform for electrohysterogram signals.
Terrien J; Marque C; Gondry J; Steingrimsdottir T; Karlsson B
Comput Biol Med; 2010 Feb; 40(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 20056198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
