BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24111464)

  • 1. Ultrasound analysis of the uterine wall movement for improved electrohysterographic measurement and modeling.
    Rabotti C; de Lau H; Haazen N; Oei G; Mischi M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7436-9. PubMed ID: 24111464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated electrohysterographic detection of uterine contractions for monitoring of pregnancy: feasibility and prospects.
    Muszynski C; Happillon T; Azudin K; Tylcz JB; Istrate D; Marque C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):136. PubMed ID: 29739438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrohysterography during pregnancy: preliminary report.
    Gondry J; Marque C; Duchene J; Cabrol D
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993; 27(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8369867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards improving uterine electrical activity modeling and electrohysterography: ultrasonic quantification of uterine movements during labor.
    de Lau H; Rabotti C; Haazen N; Oei SG; Mischi M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1323-6. PubMed ID: 24117329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the propagation analysis of electrohysterographic signals.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar J; Oei G; Bergmans J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3868-71. PubMed ID: 19163557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acquisition and Analysis of Electrohysterogram Signal.
    R P; S SD
    J Med Syst; 2020 Feb; 44(3):66. PubMed ID: 32040634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of EHG contractions at term labor by nonlinear analysis.
    Garcia-Gonzalez MT; Charleston-Villalobos S; Vargas-Garcia C; Gonzalez-Camarena R; Aljama-Corrales T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7432-5. PubMed ID: 24111463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part I. Contractions monitoring].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):791-7. PubMed ID: 19140504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An electro-mechanical multiscale model of uterine pregnancy contraction.
    Yochum M; Laforêt J; Marque C
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Oct; 77():182-94. PubMed ID: 27567400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of labor using non-invasive Laplacian EHG recordings.
    Ye-Lin Y; Prats-Boluda G; Alberola-Rubio J; Bueno Barrachina JM; Perales A; Garcia-Casado J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7428-31. PubMed ID: 24111462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrohysterographic conduction velocity estimation.
    Mischi M; Rabotti C; Vosters LJ; Oei SG; Bergmans JM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6934-7. PubMed ID: 19964460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of EHG Contractions at Pregnancy and Term Labor by Multiscale Entropy Analysis.
    Garcia-Gonzalez MT; Charleston-Villalobos S; Gonzalez-Camarena R; Garcia-Ruiz AC; Aljama-Corrales T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5987-5990. PubMed ID: 31947211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.
    Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; McGorray SP; Euliano N; Onkala A; Gregg AR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 208(1):66.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23122926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization and automatic classification of preterm and term uterine records.
    Jager F; Libenšek S; Geršak K
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202125. PubMed ID: 30153264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrohysterographic detection of uterine contractions in term pregnancy.
    Bajlekov GI; Rabotti C; Oei SG; Mischi M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():5851-4. PubMed ID: 26737622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic identification of motion artifacts in EHG recording for robust analysis of uterine contractions.
    Ye-Lin Y; Garcia-Casado J; Prats-Boluda G; Alberola-Rubio J; Perales A
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():470786. PubMed ID: 24523828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part II. Contractions parameters].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):798-804. PubMed ID: 19140505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Prognostic value of chosen parameters of mechanical and bioelectrical uterine activity in prediction of threatening preterm labour].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 19382611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-channel electrohysterography enabled uterine contraction characterization and its effect in delivery assessment.
    Shen J; Liu Y; Zhang M; Pumir A; Mu L; Li B; Xu J
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Dec; 167():107697. PubMed ID: 37976821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance comparison of coupling-evaluation methods in discriminating between pregnancy and labor EHG signals.
    Diab A; Boudaoud S; Karlsson B; Marque C
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 May; 132():104308. PubMed ID: 33711558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.