185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24111732)
41. Endometrial hyperplasia and the risk of progression to carcinoma.
Lacey JV; Chia VM
Maturitas; 2009 May; 63(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 19285814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Poor interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of high-grade endometrial carcinoma.
Gilks CB; Oliva E; Soslow RA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Jun; 37(6):874-81. PubMed ID: 23629444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Trimble CL; Kauderer J; Zaino R; Silverberg S; Lim PC; Burke JJ; Alberts D; Curtin J
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):812-9. PubMed ID: 16400639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Urothelial neoplasia of the urinary bladder--comparison of interobserver variability for WHO Classification 1972 with WHO/ISUP Consensus Classification 1998.
Mamoon N; Iqbal MA; Jamal S; Luqman M
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2006; 18(2):4-8. PubMed ID: 16977804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of endometrial cancer risk in patients with endometrial precancerous lesions: WHO 1994 vs EIN classification.
Kender Erturk N; Basaran D; Salman C
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 May; 42(4):692-695. PubMed ID: 34415826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Endometrial hyperplastic changes and precancerous conditions: terminology and classification].
Kondrikov NI; Silakova AV
Arkh Patol; 2010; 72(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 20369591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Endometrial hyperplasia and the risk of coexistent cancer: WHO versus EIN criteria.
Travaglino A; Raffone A; Saccone G; Mollo A; De Placido G; Insabato L; Zullo F
Histopathology; 2019 Apr; 74(5):676-687. PubMed ID: 30347477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Reproducibility determination of WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia/well differentiated adenocarcinoma and comparison with computerized morphometric data in curettage specimens in Iran.
Izadi-Mood N; Yarmohammadi M; Ahmadi SA; Irvanloo G; Haeri H; Meysamie AP; Khaniki M
Diagn Pathol; 2009 Mar; 4():10. PubMed ID: 19317919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Significant variation in the assessment of cervical involvement in endometrial carcinoma: an interobserver variation study.
McCluggage WG; Hirschowitz L; Wilson GE; Oliva E; Soslow RA; Zaino RJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Feb; 35(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 21263250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Loss of PTEN expression as diagnostic marker of endometrial precancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Raffone A; Travaglino A; Saccone G; Campanino MR; Mollo A; De Placido G; Insabato L; Zullo F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Mar; 98(3):275-286. PubMed ID: 30511743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. PTEN-loss and nuclear atypia of EIN in endometrial biopsies can predict the existence of a concurrent endometrial carcinoma.
Pavlakis K; Messini I; Vrekoussis T; Panoskaltsis T; Chrissanthakis D; Yiannou P; Stathopoulos EN
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Dec; 119(3):516-9. PubMed ID: 20833413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Observer variability in endometrial cytology using kappa statistics.
Tezuka F; Namiki T; Higashiiwai H
J Clin Pathol; 1992 Apr; 45(4):292-4. PubMed ID: 1577966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of anal intraepithelial neoplasia.
Lytwyn A; Salit IE; Raboud J; Chapman W; Darragh T; Winkler B; Tinmouth J; Mahony JB; Sano M
Cancer; 2005 Apr; 103(7):1447-56. PubMed ID: 15726546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma.
Scholten AN; Smit VT; Beerman H; van Putten WL; Creutzberg CL
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 14770433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Benign endometrial hyperplasia sequence and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia.
Mutter GL; Zaino RJ; Baak JP; Bentley RC; Robboy SJ
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2007 Apr; 26(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 17413975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. BCL-2 and PAX2 Expressions in EIN which Had Been Previously Diagnosed as Non-Atypical Hyperplasia.
Trabzonlu L; Muezzinoglu B; Corakci A
Pathol Oncol Res; 2019 Apr; 25(2):471-476. PubMed ID: 29270778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Complexity of glandular architecture should be reconsidered in the classification and management of endometrial hyperplasia.
Travaglino A; Raffone A; Saccone G; Mollo A; De Placido G; Mascolo M; Insabato L; Zullo F
APMIS; 2019 Jun; 127(6):427-434. PubMed ID: 30802329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Precursor lesions of endometrial carcinoma].
Lax SF
Pathologe; 2019 Feb; 40(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 30707274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Interobserver reproducibility in the pathologic diagnosis of borderline ductal proliferative breast diseases].
Wei B; Bu H; Zhu CR; Guo LX; Chen HJ; Zhao C; Zhang P; Chen DY; Tang Y; Jiang Y
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Nov; 35(6):849-53. PubMed ID: 15573772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Prediction of endometrial carcinoma by subjective endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis.
Hecht JL; Ince TA; Baak JP; Baker HE; Ogden MW; Mutter GL
Mod Pathol; 2005 Mar; 18(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 15529181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
