342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24111751)
1. Error and its meaning in forensic science.
Christensen AM; Crowder CM; Ousley SD; Houck MM
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):123-6. PubMed ID: 24111751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptions and estimates of error rates in forensic science: A survey of forensic analysts.
Murrie DC; Gardner BO; Kelley S; Dror IE
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109887. PubMed ID: 31404811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part II--judicial reasoning in decisions to exclude forensic identification evidence on grounds of reliability.
Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):913-7. PubMed ID: 21729081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I--A quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence.
Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1180-4. PubMed ID: 21884119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The over-citation of Daubert in forensic anthropology.
Lesciotto KM; Christensen AM
J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 37855082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability.
Martire KA; Ballantyne KN; Bali A; Edmond G; Kemp RI; Found B
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109877. PubMed ID: 31415947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement.
Budowle B; Bottrell MC; Bunch SG; Fram R; Harrison D; Meagher S; Oien CT; Peterson PE; Seiger DP; Smith MB; Smrz MA; Soltis GL; Stacey RB
J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):798-809. PubMed ID: 19486241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Epistemology applied to conclusions of expert reports.
Lucena-Molina JJ
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jul; 264():122-31. PubMed ID: 27108354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Weakening forensic science in Spain: from expert evidence to documentary evidence.
Lucena-Molina JJ; Pardo-Iranzo V; Gonzalez-Rodriguez J
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):952-63. PubMed ID: 22329955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National Academy of Sciences "standardization": on what terms?
Bunch AW
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1041-5. PubMed ID: 24854677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science.
Saks MJ; Koehler JJ
Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5736):892-5. PubMed ID: 16081727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ten years after Daubert: the status of the states.
Keierleber JA; Bohan TL
J Forensic Sci; 2005 Sep; 50(5):1154-63. PubMed ID: 16225224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Science, truth, and forensic cultures: the exceptional legal status of DNA evidence.
Lynch M
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 23117027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Forensic fictions: science, television production, and modern storytelling.
Kirby DA
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 23017272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Commentary on: Page M, Taylor J, Blenkin M. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I--a quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence. J Forensic Sci 2011;56(5):1180-4.
Mohammed LA; Singer K
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):1142; author reply 1143. PubMed ID: 22748154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review in forensic science.
Ballantyne KN; Edmond G; Found B
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():66-76. PubMed ID: 28622536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific integrity in the forensic sciences: Consumerism, conflicts of interest, and transparency.
Passalacqua NV; Pilloud MA; Belcher WR
Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):573-579. PubMed ID: 31472803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A call for more science in forensic science.
Bell S; Sah S; Albright TD; Gates SJ; Denton MB; Casadevall A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(18):4541-4544. PubMed ID: 29650539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality management systems and the admissibility of scientific evidence: the Costa Rican experience.
Salas M; Gomez D
Bull Narc; 2005; 57(1-2):259-69. PubMed ID: 21338026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
