These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24111751)

  • 21. The Foundations of the Comparison Forensic Sciences: Report of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.
    Cordner S; Ranson D; Bassed R
    J Law Med; 2016; 24(2):297-302. PubMed ID: 30137704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The scientific reinvention of forensic science.
    Koehler JJ; Mnookin JL; Saks MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Oct; 120(41):e2301840120. PubMed ID: 37782789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Commentary on: Page M, Taylor J, Blenkin M. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part II--judicial reasoning in decisions to exclude forensic identification evidence on grounds of reliability. J Forensic Sci 2011;56(4):913-7.
    Hart RP
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jan; 57(1):278. PubMed ID: 22150396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The legal framework for more robust forensic science evidence.
    Rt Hon. the Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Just truth? Carefully applying history, philosophy and sociology of science to the forensic use of CCTV images.
    Edmond G
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 23036862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Applications and limitations of Forensic Biomechanics: a Bayesian perspective.
    Freeman MD; Kohles SS
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2010 Feb; 17(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 20129425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Addressing the National Academy of Sciences' challenge: a method for statistical pattern comparison of striated tool marks.
    Petraco ND; Shenkin P; Speir J; Diaczuk P; Pizzola PA; Gambino C; Petraco N
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):900-11. PubMed ID: 22471845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Forensic identification: From a faith-based "Science" to a scientific science.
    Saks MJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):14-7. PubMed ID: 20395085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nature and place of crime scene management within forensic sciences.
    Crispino F
    Sci Justice; 2008 Mar; 48(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 18450214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Renegotiating forensic cultures: between law, science and criminal justice.
    Roberts P
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 23022585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The good, the bad, the ugly: the NAS report on strengthening forensic science in America.
    Kaye DH
    Sci Justice; 2010 Mar; 50(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 20408376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implementing statistical learning methods through Bayesian networks. Part 1: a guide to Bayesian parameter estimation using forensic science data.
    Biedermann A; Taroni F; Bozza S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Dec; 193(1-3):63-71. PubMed ID: 19833464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion Association of Forensic Science Providers.
    Willis S
    Sci Justice; 2010 Mar; 50(1):49. PubMed ID: 20408380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. U.S. initiatives to strengthen forensic science & international standards in forensic DNA.
    Butler JM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Sep; 18():4-20. PubMed ID: 26164236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Label the limits of forensic science.
    Mejia R
    Nature; 2017 Apr; 544(7648):7. PubMed ID: 28383000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Scientific guidelines for evaluating the validity of forensic feature-comparison methods.
    Scurich N; Faigman DL; Albright TD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Oct; 120(41):e2301843120. PubMed ID: 37782809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Forensic pedology, forensic geology, forensic geoscience, geoforensics and soil forensics.
    Ruffell A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Oct; 202(1-3):9-12. PubMed ID: 20430544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Forensic culture as epistemic culture: the sociology of forensic science.
    Cole SA
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 23021588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Beliefs about error rates and human judgment in forensic science.
    Ribeiro G; Tangen JM; McKimmie BM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():138-147. PubMed ID: 30802644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Forensic science in the context of Islamic law: A review.
    Alkahtani T; Aljerian K; Golding B; Alqahtani S
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Aug; 34():179-81. PubMed ID: 26165681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.