385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24112040)
1. A framework for developing objective and measurable recovery criteria for threatened and endangered species.
Himes Boor GK
Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 24112040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Actual and potential use of population viability analyses in recovery of plant species listed under the US endangered species act.
Zeigler SL; Che-Castaldo JP; Neel MC
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1265-78. PubMed ID: 24033732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Climate change, marine environments, and the US Endangered species act.
Seney EE; Rowland MJ; Lowery RA; Griffis RB; McClure MM
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1138-46. PubMed ID: 24299080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Developing metapopulation connectivity criteria from genetic and habitat data to recover the endangered Mexican wolf.
Carroll C; Fredrickson RJ; Lacy RC
Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 24112074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incorporating climate science in applications of the US endangered species act for aquatic species.
McClure MM; Alexander M; Borggaard D; Boughton D; Crozier L; Griffis R; Jorgensen JC; Lindley ST; Nye J; Rowland MJ; Seney EE; Snover A; Toole C; VAN Houtan K
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1222-33. PubMed ID: 24299088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing decision rules for categorizing species' extinction risk to help develop quantitative listing criteria for the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Regan TJ; Taylor BL; Thompson GG; Cochrane JF; Ralls K; Runge MC; Merrick R
Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):821-31. PubMed ID: 23646933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the impact of the U.S. Endangered Species Act recovery planning guidelines on managing threats for listed species.
Troyer CM; Gerber LR
Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1423-33. PubMed ID: 26108948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating effects of tidal power projects and climate change on threatened and endangered marine species and their food web.
Busch DS; Greene CM; Good TP
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1190-200. PubMed ID: 24299085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative tools for implementing the new definition of significant portion of the range in the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Earl JE; Nicol S; Wiederholt R; Diffendorfer JE; Semmens D; Flockhart DTT; Mattsson BJ; McCracken G; Norris DR; Thogmartin WE; López-Hoffman L
Conserv Biol; 2018 Feb; 32(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 28574183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incorporating climate and ocean change into extinction risk assessments for 82 coral species.
Brainard RE; Weijerman M; Eakin CM; McElhany P; Miller MW; Patterson M; Piniak GA; Dunlap MJ; Birkeland C
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1169-78. PubMed ID: 24299083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Geography and recovery under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Carroll C; Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Rohlf DJ; Phillips MK
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 20151988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Species-level persistence probabilities for recovery and conservation status assessment.
Che-Castaldo JP; Neel MC
Conserv Biol; 2016 Dec; 30(6):1297-1306. PubMed ID: 27030933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Haig SM; Beever EA; Chambers SM; Draheim HM; Dugger BD; Dunham S; Elliott-Smith E; Fontaine JB; Kesler DC; Knaus BJ; Lopes IF; Loschl P; Mullins TD; Sheffield LM
Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1584-94. PubMed ID: 17181793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detecting extinction risk from climate change by IUCN Red List criteria.
Keith DA; Mahony M; Hines H; Elith J; Regan TJ; Baumgartner JB; Hunter D; Heard GW; Mitchell NJ; Parris KM; Penman T; Scheele B; Simpson CC; Tingley R; Tracy CR; West M; Akçakaya HR
Conserv Biol; 2014 Jun; 28(3):810-9. PubMed ID: 24512339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current practices in the identification of critical habitat for threatened species.
Camaclang AE; Maron M; Martin TG; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):482-92. PubMed ID: 25472827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structuring decisions for managing threatened and endangered species in a changing climate.
Gregory R; Arvai J; Gerber LR
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1212-21. PubMed ID: 24299087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The normative dimension and legal meaning of endangered and recovery in the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Phillips MK
Conserv Biol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):1383-90. PubMed ID: 17002756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting recovery criteria for threatened and endangered plant species on the basis of past abundances and biological traits.
Neel MC; Che-Castaldo JP
Conserv Biol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):385-97. PubMed ID: 23293869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A biological framework for evaluating whether a species is threatened or endangered in a significant portion of its range.
Waples RS; Adams PB; Bohnsack J; Taylor BL
Conserv Biol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):964-74. PubMed ID: 17650247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The contribution of policy, law, management, research, and advocacy failings to the recent extinctions of three Australian vertebrate species.
Woinarski JC; Garnett ST; Legge SM; Lindenmayer DB
Conserv Biol; 2017 Feb; 31(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 27704619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
